Categories
At Large Opinion

Learn to Discern

“As America faces the most severe border crisis in decades, TN is showing the rest of the country what it means to lead. Today, I joined TN National Guard members who will soon deploy on a voluntary mission to secure the Southern border as the federal government fails to act.”

The quote is from an X post by Tennessee Governor Bill Lee last Friday. He was pictured standing in front of 20 or so camo-clad warriors who were apparently going to Texas to … stand along the border somewhere? No word on who would be giving them orders. The Texas governor? The Texas National Guard commander? President Biden? Doesn’t matter. It wasn’t about governing or policy or real life. It was political theater. A photo op.

Judging from the responses to the post, lots of other people besides me saw it as empty grandstanding. Many pointed out that Tennessee had plenty of problems of its own — gun violence, education, healthcare — that ol’ Bill could be paying attention to instead of doing Kabuki theater in a local gymnasium.

Others responded on X, correctly, that House Republicans had declined to support a border bill that could have done much to improve the situation just a week before. Here’s LGilmore: “Good grief. What a freaking waste of time and taxpayer money for political gain. We see your two-faced perpetuation of a problem you refuse to help solve.”

But there were also positive responses to Lee’s post. Here’s one from LITizen JEFF: “Thank you, Sir, and especially, thank you to the patriots in the TN National Guard.” He probably had tears in his eyes while he typed that.

What forms the differing attitudes of LGilmore and LITizen JEFF? Well, assuming they’re not ’bots, it would be a fair guess to say it’s the sources of news they consume. According to a Pew Research study, conservatives like JEFF head to the right-wing buffet table, where they can get a steady diet of Fox News, Newsmax, OAN, Joe Rogan, Epoch Times, etc. Progressive/liberal thinkers like LG are more likely to be consumers of CNN, MSNBC, NPR, PBS NewsHour, and The New York Times.

When it comes to news, what we consume quite naturally shapes what we believe. A great example of this is the current exchange of video-fire over which old guy running for president is in worse shape. Call it “Dueling Dodderers.” My social media feeds are now filled with clips of Donald Trump’s verbal miscues. He is slurring a lot of words in his stump speeches these days and frequently losing his train of thought. And every time it happens, a clip of it gets posted and amplified in all the liberal media. I consume it gleefully because I think Trump is an evil clown and it gives me hope that he may yet disintegrate into a gooey orange puddle of bile.

Likewise, there are lots of clips of President Biden misspeaking or turning the wrong way or stumbling on a stairway that make the rounds in right-wing media. I don’t see as many of these because I don’t visit those sites much. That’s mainly because the algorithm gods have learned I prefer not to consume right-wing stuff.

That’s how it works: You pick your news, then your news picks you. So, here’s some good advice: Learn how to pick news sources that are trustworthy. Don’t amplify news stories, quotes, memes, or even videos unless you are certain they are legitimate. That juicy clip of Trump being unable to pronounce “Venezuela” may tickle your schadenfreude, but don’t forward it unless it’s from a legitimate source. AI video is real — and, increasingly, a source of disinformation.

Media literacy is a course that should be taught in every school in America from the seventh grade on. Knowing how to discern reliable sources in the flood of information that deluges us — and our children — needs to be a top educational priority.

For starters, here’s a list of the 10 least-biased news sources, according to Pew Research: AP News, Reuters News Service, BBC News, Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg.com, New York Times, C-Span, NPR/PBS, Forbes.com, NBC News. We need to be vigilant. If we consume disinformation and spread it, we’re nothing more than vacuous propagandists. Like Bill Lee.

Categories
Letter From The Editor Opinion

Letter from the Editor: Tropical Storm Sequester

Are you prepared for Tropical Storm Sequester? It’s coming March 1st and will leave all kinds of destruction in its wake, according to many forecasts. Sequester follows close on the heels of Tropical Storm Fiscal Cliff, which in January threatened to destroy America, before narrowly being averted by the heroic actions of the president and Congress.

Sequester has been hovering just outside Washington, D.C., since August 2011, when Congress invented it as a mechanism to force itself to further reduce the deficit. The theory being, apparently, that it would be such a horrible financial disaster that no one in their right mind would seriously consider letting it happen.

Now many GOP forecasters from the Whether Channel say Sequester is not a big deal after all and that the storm won’t really harm us. The Whether Channel’s Bobby Jindal accused the administration of “political theater.” The Wall Street Journal says Sequester will actually be a good thing.

The White House, on the other hand, is claiming Sequester will leave a devastating wake, causing furloughs for thousands of federal employees, including air-traffic controllers, TSA agents, border patrol, and military personnel, and will cut vital funds allocated for education, unemployment benefits, Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, environmental regulation, postal service, and health care.

Who’s right? Depends on who you want to believe. According to a Pew poll, 62 percent of Americans believe Sequester will have a negative impact. How much won’t be known immediately. The storm officially hits March 1st, but it will take awhile before the full extent of the damage is known, since each federal agency will independently determine what to cut and how to do it.

Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood says mandatory days off for TSA agents and air-traffic controllers will mean log-jammed air travel. Homeland Security secretary Janet Napolitano says fewer border patrol agents will hamper the nation’s ability to control its borders. In response to massive cuts to the states for many programs, the nation’s governors this week asked Congress to come up with a more balanced and nuanced plan of action.

The Whether Channel’s John McCain called Sequester “dumb” and “devastating,” adding that it could cost his home state 49,000 jobs. But his wingman, Lindsey Graham, says “it will happen.” The White House calls Sequester “a blunt instrument” and a foolhardy way to deal with the deficit in a fragile economy.

I agree with all three of them.

Bruce VanWyngarden

brucev@memphisflyer.com