Categories
News News Blog News Feature

A Darker Side of Red Part One: Origins of Right-Wing Extremism in Tennessee

It was dark by the time Michael Miller left the Williamson County Administrative Building on West Main Street in Franklin on Aug. 10, 2021.

“Will not comply!” shouted a throng of angry far-right protesters in the parking lot as Miller stepped into the warm, Middle Tennessee night. “Will not comply!”

Miller, masked and wearing a light-colored button-down shirt and shorts, was leaving a Williamson County Schools special school board meeting about Covid-19 safety protocols. At the time, new daily Covid-19 cases in the state were rising. And the highly transmissible Delta variant had many people — but not everyone — concerned. During the meeting, he had spoken in favor of a mask mandate and additional protocols.

Before the end, the school board voted on a short-term mask mandate for students, staff and visitors at elementary-grade levels in all buses and buildings: Seven voted for the mask mandate, three voted against it.

Within seconds of leaving, protesters started descending on Miller.

“Child abusers!” one man, buff and in a tight-fitting black t-shirt, yelled at Miller. “You are child abusers! There’s a place for you guys! There’s a bad place in hell, and everybody’s taking notes, Buddy!”

Law enforcement helped Miller get to his gray SUV. But Miller wasn’t in the clear. The guy in the black t-shirt met him there.

“We know who you are!” the man shouted as Miller closed his driver door. “We know who you are! No more masks!”

“Keep it calm!” another guy, bald, said to the man in the black t-shirt. The bald guy continued trying to cool off the man in the black t-shirt, claiming that the police officers present were on their side. Then, the two men went after Miller, already inside the SUV.

“We know who you are!” the two yelled, pointing at Miller.

“We know who you are!” the bald man said again, still pointing. “You can leave freely, but we will find you! And we know who you are!”

“You will never be allowed in public again!” the man in the black t-shirt threatened before law enforcement stepped in and started making a path for Miller to drive away.

Over the years, people with far-right ideologies have made their presence known in the United States. They’ve taken warped, twisted stances on things, like race, religion, the federal government. They’ve gotten steamrolled by conspiracy theories and spread them. Lives have been lost. But that hasn’t been all. Members of the far right in the U.S. have tried to reshape things closer to home: the communities they live in. That night in August, Williamson County was in the crosshairs. The attention wasn’t new. Just like it wasn’t for the state overall. None of it would dissipate.

The evolution of a county

Tennessee has three regions: West, Middle and East. Nashville — the boozy, country music playground that tourists have flocked to for years that doubles as the state’s capital — calls Middle Tennessee home. And just a little south of that is Williamson County. More or less in the middle of Williamson County is the city of Franklin.

Williamson County is suburban. It grew a lot between 2010 and 2020, according to U.S. Census Bureau data, going from 183,182 people to 247,726. Per 2019 data from the Census Bureau, Williamson County is whiter than both Tennessee as a whole and the U.S.: 88.2 percent of Williamson County is white, compared to 78.4 percent in Tennessee and 76.3 percent in the U.S. It’s also more educated than Tennessee and the country in terms of people aged 25 years and older who have at least a high-school degree, the Census Bureau reports from 2016 through 2020.

It was also more affluent than both the state and the U.S. during that same time period. The median household income in 2020 U.S. dollars for Williamson County was $111,196. Tennessee’s was $54,833. For the U.S., it was $64,994.

“Williamson County is a very family-centric community,” 38-year-old Elizabeth Madeira says. “If you ask most people why they moved to Williamson County, most of them would probably say for the public schools.”

Madeira and her husband moved to Franklin in 2008. They and their three kids called Franklin home until the summer of 2022, when they moved to Nashville.

Downtown Franklin is cute in an old, small-town kind of way. Little shops and restaurants line Main Street, the downtown’s primary road. Encircled by a roundabout in the heart of historic Downtown Franklin is the grassy Public Square.

There’s more to Franklin, though. Vestiges of the slavery era and the country’s Civil War can be found here and there. On Franklin’s Public Square, a statue honoring Confederate troops stands, as does a newer one, unveiled in October 2021 and dedicated to the U.S. Colored Troops. It honors the formerly enslaved people who fought for the Union. 

Williamson County is a very family-centric community. If you ask most people why they moved to Williamson County, most of them would probably say for the public schools.

– Elizabeth Madeira

Tennessee is a red state. The Republican party has controlled the state’s legislature and governor’s office since 2010, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

In March of 2016, Donald Trump won the state’s GOP presidential primary. Come that year’s general election, the state went to Trump, and Trump went to the White House.

As the incumbent seeking re-election in 2020, Trump, once again, picked up Tennessee in the presidential election.

Despite its redness, Tennessee has evolved, Madeira, a Democrat, says. She has noticed the state’s Republican party has gone further to the right, has gotten more extreme.

In April 2009, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Extremism and Radicalization Branch, Homeland Environment Threat Analysis Division — in coordination with the FBI — prepared an assessment of right-wing extremism in the country. While the assessment noted that Homeland Security didn’t have any specific information indicating violence was being planned by domestic right-wing terrorists, the assessment did flag something else: Right-wing extremists might be adding new recruits. How? Fear-mongering.

Far-right ideology in the U.S. has grown over time. Those who plan and potentially carry out physical violence represent one end of the ideological spectrum. The other end is non-violent; however, people on the non-violent end aren’t necessarily harmless.

There was this fear that Barack Obama was some kind of communist in disguise or working with the Muslim Brotherhood and was plotting the downfall of American society. And that was really animating to a lot of anti-government sentiment.

– Jared Holt, Institute for Strategic Dialogue

Jared Holt is a senior research manager at the international non-profit Institute for Strategic Dialogue. ISD focuses on human rights as well polarization, extremism and disinformation. At ISD, Holt specializes in working on U.S. hate and extremism. He says far-right movements have taken advantage, to at least some extent, of disorder. Two examples are a lack of trust in institutions and fear of what the future might hold.

After Barack Obama became president in 2008, Holt says the far-right militia movement had a little bit of a resurgence. Then, fueled by social media and the ability to sidestep traditional media gatekeepers, like journalists and their news outlets, the early stages of the white-nationalist alt-right started taking shape. Also, says Holt, anti-government sentiment brewed during Obama’s two presidential terms. A lot of what caused that festering, Holt thinks, was culture shock from having a Black man as president.

“There was this fear that Barack Obama was some kind of communist in disguise or working with the Muslim Brotherhood and was plotting the downfall of American society,” Holt explains. “And that was really animating to a lot of anti-government sentiment.”

That anti-government sentiment dissipated around 2015 with the arrival of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, Holt notes. Not ones to typically get excited about a president, far-right extremists saw an opportunity. Sure enough, Trump embraced their rhetoric. So, white nationalists, militias and extreme conspiracy theorists all threw their weight behind Trump. Elizabeth Madeira (Photo: John Partipilo)

With Trump sitting in the Oval Office, Holt says, far-right ideology “claw[ed] forward” into the forefront. The far-right conspiracy QAnon entered the picture, as did extremist groups, like the Proud Boys. Militias and the “America First” white-nationalist movement did, too. Holt contends Trump moved the Republican party more toward the far-right. Holt adds, though, not every Conservative and Republican espouses far-right ideologies. That said, Holt does feel that far-right ideology has become mainstream in the GOP. Trump wasn’t alone in helping make this happen, Holt points out: one of Fox News’s now-former on-air personalities, in particular, had a role.

“Tucker Carlson is like a king-maker in the Conservative movement,” Holt namechecks Fox News’s now-former, and formerly much-watched, nighttime talk-show host. Carlson repeatedly spewed far-right garbage to his viewers.

In Elizabeth Madeira’s eyes, initially, at the community level, the Tennessee Republican party’s extremist progression was a slow, drip-by-drip thing. But then came Trump, his 2016 presidential campaign, the early years of his presidency. Madeira says they sped the progression up.

Tennessee elected Republican Bill Lee, who’s from Franklin, to be the state’s newest governor in 2018. Madeira says Lee took the baton from Trump and accelerated things even more, which made the state party’s evolution go even quicker.

Look for part two in our series A darker shade of red tomorrow.

Tennessee Lookout is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Tennessee Lookout maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Holly McCall for questions: info@tennesseelookout.com. Follow Tennessee Lookout on Facebook and Twitter.

Categories
News News Blog News Feature

CLA Report: Tennessee Ties For Second Most-Conservative State House

Tennessee and Indiana tied for the second most-conservative group of state lawmakers in 2021 during a “new level of political polarization,” according to the Center for Legislative Accountability (CLA), a conservative think tank. 

The group released findings of a new study last month that reviewed votes from all 7,400 of the country’s state lawmakers from all 50 states. This covered more than 265,000 votes on about 3,500 bills introduced in state legislatures.  

In 2021, Tennessee’s GOP-controlled House and Senate was just barely less conservative than top-ranking Alabama. Tennessee’s lawmakers voted “with the conservative position” (as CLA puts it) 73 percent of the time. Alabama topped the state by one percentage point with 74 percent. 

The CLA tracked dozens of bills in the Nashville Capitol that year, everything from bills regulating art therapists and homemade food to teaching Critical Race Theory and carrying guns without a permit. 

The CLA’s highest (most conservative) score went to Sen. Paul Bailey (R-Sparta) who voted by CLA’s definition of conservative 87 percent of the time. Former Sen. Brian Kelsey (R-Germantown), awaiting sentencing after a conviction on election fraud charges, scored 85 percent. The lowest-ranking lawmaker (19 percent) in 2021 was Sen. Katrina Robinson (D-Memphis) who lost her seat after wire-fraud convictions in 2021. 

Tennessee lawmakers score well on the issues of elections, property rights, education, law, and personal liberty. Their weakest issues are energy and environment and taxes, budget, and spending. 

While the state tied for second in 2021, it ranks at the top of the list for all of the years CLA has been collecting this data. 

Nationally, the CLA report found the nation’s 3,906 Republican state lawmakers voted conservatively nearly 81 percent of the time, up from 76 percent in 2021. The nation’s 3,223 Democratic state lawmakers voted conservatively about 16 percent in 2021, down from nearly 19 percent in 2020.     

“The 64.99 percentage point divide between the two political parties marks the highest level of political polarization since the CLA became the first and only organization to track such data in 2015,” reads the CLA report. 

The CLA report said the least conservative state houses can be found in Massachusetts, Hawaii, Rhode Island, California, and Maryland.  

The CLA is a project of CPAC Foundation and the American Conservative Union Foundation.

Categories
Opinion The Last Word

Uncritical Political Discourse

Tuesday primary elections are a routine occasion of frustration for many Americans. August 16, 2022, continued this trend. Central questions included ideas about the amount of power still wielded by Donald Trump, whether the accomplishments of the Biden administration have been promoted enough, and whether election results can be trusted.

Many pundits point to Trump-endorsed Harriet Hageman defeating Rep. Liz Cheney as more proof that Trump is in control of the Republican Party. Ten Republicans in the House of Representatives voted to impeach Donald Trump for inciting the January 6th Capitol insurrection; four retired rather than face reelection, four lost to Trump-backed opponents, and two advanced to the general election.

This requires a critical analysis. Let’s look at a few elements.

Results from a 2019 CivicScience survey help to articulate the complicated mess that uncritical analysis creates. The survey revealed troubling information about how bias and prejudice problematize political decision-making.

For example, 56 percent of respondents said that schools in America shouldn’t teach Arabic numerals (which, as every schoolchild should know, are the numerals we all use every day and throughout American education, i.e., 1, 2, 3, 4 … ). While they do not claim that this indicates a stunning level of both ignorance and commitment to purblind prejudice, that should be quite obvious.

We’ve all seen the uproar over critical race theory, which at its core is simply a commitment to teach pupils the truth about American history. The truth is what students need. They can decide for themselves what they believe to be good, great, bad, or evil. But Fox News and Republicans call for a ban on such teaching.

Some of this obdurate, willing ignorance is rooted in a kind of tribalism. This can be an uncritical acceptance of dogmatic positioning and dishonesty in the name of loyalty to group, but has no authentic place in a democracy. If I go along with my tribe (e.g., progressives, conservatives) uncritically, I am both lazy and cowardly.

I’m lazy when I don’t fact-check my “leaders.”

I’m cowardly when I do fact-check them, find their errors, and fail to alter my position accordingly.

A lazy and cowardly democracy is no democracy at all.

Continued loyalty to Donald Trump presents a departure from democratic norms and an embrace of fascism. He introduces falsehoods and repeats lies of others when it seems to serve him.

The acceptance of QAnon conspiracy theory — demonstrably false by any due-diligence, reasonable standard — into the Republican party has created a GQP that values allegiance to party over country. Facts and truth have taken a sideline; hence, we see a deeper movement toward authoritarianism.

Trump’s Tuesday victories undermine the pillars of democracy. He undermines choosing and replacing elected officials in free and fair elections. His supporters discourage active participation of the people, as citizens, in politics and civic life. The GQP attacks human rights and equality under the law.

It is an extremely important time for people to think, act, and vote. The people have the power and can reclaim guarantees for free and fair elections and affirmations for equality and human rights. Everyone needs to commit and prepare to safeguard democratic institutions and values before they’re gone.

Wim Laven, Ph.D., syndicated by PeaceVoice, teaches courses in political science and conflict resolution.

Categories
Politics Politics Beat Blog

Election 2018: Winners, Losers, and Close Calls

JB

The thrill of victory was experienced by (l to r) Aaron Fowles, Steve Mulroy, and Racquel Collins, opponents of the losing referendum to repeal Instranr Runoff Voting.

Note: For reasons that remain obscure, the following text, published in the early morning of November 7, vanished from online, to be replaced by an earlier election-highlights brief that was posted on election night itself. I am happy to see the longer piece, like Lazarus, freed from untimely interment and restored. — jb

When the final report was done, the last round poured, the surviving hors-d’oeuvres wilted, the election results locally mirrored those nationally. There were lots of near misses, college tries, and moral victories — mainly among Democrats who had aspired to overturn the verdict of 2016 (or, in many ways, of the last few decades).

But the inherent limitations of the near miss, the college try, and the moral victory would rapidly become obvious as the reality of defeat and the resilience of the status quo sunk in.

The purest and most unsullied triumph locally was enjoyed by the band of activists in Save IRV Memphis and their sympathizers, who resisted a concentrated effort by the Memphis City Council on behalf of three ballot referenda that, the activists contended, were designed to protect the incumbency of Council members.

To start there, the count was 62,316 for and 104,431 against in the case of Ordinance No. 5669, which would have repealed the prior 2008 referendum authorizing IRV (a method of vote -counting that successively redistributes runner-up votes in a given race until a majority winner emerges). The vote was 67,220 for and 101,607 against for Ordinance No. 5676, which (via language that was ambivalent, to say the least) would have lengthened term limits for mayor and Council members from two to three four-year terms. And Ordinance No. 5677, which would have abolished runoff elections altogether, lost out by a vote of 77,223 for and 91,184 against.
The Democratic candidates, all first-time candidates, who attempted to oust Republican state legislators in the suburbs, made a good run of it, but fell short. In the most avidly watched race, Gabby Salinas, the three-time cancer survivor and budding scientist lost to incumbent District 31 state Senator Brian Kelsey by the relatively narrow margin of 40,313 for Kelsey to 38,793 for Salinas.

Republican incumbent Mark White turned back Democrat Danielle Schonbaum in the District 83 House of Representatives race, 15,129 to 11,376. And incumbent GOP state Representative Jim Coley defeated Democrat Allan Creasy by a vote of 12,298 to 10,073 in District 97.

More decisive victories were won by Republican incumbent Kevin Vaughan over Democear Sanjeev Memula in House District 95 and by the GOP’s Tom Leatherwood (a ballot replacement for the late Ron Lollar) over Democrat Dave Cambron in District 99.

Democratic state Rep. Dwayne Thompson, an upset winner in 2016 in House District 96, retained his seat by a vote of 14,710 over 10,493 for Republican challenger Scorr McCormick.

In the races for Governor and the U.S. Senate, local totals were:

For Governor: Democrat Karl Dean, 173,699; Republican Bill Lee, 105,369
For U.S. Senator: Democrat Phil Bredesen, 188,923; Republican Marsha Blackburn, 95,351.

Those local totals were almost diametrically opposite the statewide ones, which showed resounding victories for Lee over Dean, 1,291,458 (59.3 percent) to 846,186 (38.8 percent); and for Blackburn over Bredesen, 1,224,042 (54.7 percent) to 981,667 (43.9 percent).

Though arguments on the point can and will rage indecisively, the statewide results possibly reflected the natural dispositions of red-state Tennessee in cases where the Democratic challenge is muted by politesse. Dean and Lee reciprocated their gentlemanly approaches to each other, while Bredesen’s acknowledgement of partisan differences was minimal to the point of non-existence.

Bredesen surely qualifies for the 2018 “Oh, Yeah?” award for his mid-race statement to Jonathan Martin of the New York Times: “I’m in the fortunate position that people on the left are enraged enough that they will find almost anything I do, with the D after my name, acceptable.”
Count that as arrogance or as self-deception. It was demonstrably incorrect.

Bredesen’s public embrace of President Trump’s Supreme Court nomination of Brett Kavanaugh and his suggestion in a late ad that he and Trump (“a skilled negotiator”) could blissfully work together to lower drug prices were downers to his base, whereas Democrat Beto O’Rourke’s throwdown of the gauntlet to Republican incumbent Ted Cruz in the Texas Senate race almost brought him a victory. Texas is clearly no more liberal a place than Tennessee.

The local difference in the gubernatorial and Senate races manifestly arose from the demographics of Shelby County, where Democratic turnout was at levels approximating those of presidential years. The stout showing of the Democratic challengers in legislative races was also buoyed by the turnout, a continuation of sorts of the blue wave that crested so strong in the august election.

The turnout factor was also prominent in the blowout win of 9th District Democratic Congressman Steve Cohen over GOP perennial Charlotte Bergmann, 143,690 to 34,710, though it was not too much help to Democratic challenger Erika Stotts Pearson in the wider West Tennessee expanse of the 8th Congressional District, where Republican incumbent David Kustoff triumphed, 66,889 to 32,578.

More to Come:

There were races in most of Shelby County’s suburban municipalities, too — the most dramatic being those in Germantown and Lakeland, where the issues of city spending and economic development loomed large.

In Germantown, Mayor Mike Palazzolo apparently won reelection by the razor-thin margin of 10,240 to 10,113 for challenger John Barzizza, who declined to concede, pending a final certification of results. The main issue in the mayoral contest was Palazzolo’s backing of Thornwood, a mixed-use development on Germantown Parkway.

Meanwhile, Palazzo’s coattails proved unavailing for two candidates he endorsed for city positions: Scott Sanders, a Barzizza endorsee, defeated Brian White in an alderman’s race, while Robyn Rey Rudisill lost a School Board race to angela Rickman Griff. Two other mayoral endorsees, Alderman Mary Anne Gibson and School Board member Betsy Landers triumphed over Jeff Brown and Brian Curry, respectively.

In Lakeland, where the primary issue was Mayor Wyatt Bunker’s development plans, including those for a new high school, Bunker was upset by challenger Mike Cunningham, 2,648 to 2,324.
Apparent winners for the city Commission were Richard Gonzales and Michelle Dial, while School Board winners were Kevin Floyd, Laura Harrison, and Deborah Thomas.

Categories
Politics Politics Beat Blog

As Expected, Luttrell Enters 8th District Congressional Race

Shelby County Mayor Mark Luttrell has definitely thrown his hat into the ring as a candidate for the soon-to-be-vacant 8th District congressional seat.

JB

County Mayor Mark Luttrell

The mayor’s bid, which was not unexpected and which, as a likely and pending matter, he discussed at length last week with the Flyer, was announced at a Reagan Day dinner of Madison County Republicans in Jackson on Monday night.

Luttrell instantly becomes one of the favorites in the GOP primary field, which also includes state Senator Brian Kelsey of Germantown, Shelby County Register of Deeds Tom Leatherwood, Shelby County Commissioner Steve Basar, former County Commissioner and radiologist/broadcast executive George Flinn, and former U.S. Attorney David Kustoff.

While the field of Republican contenders proliferates for the seat now held by Stephen Fincher of Crockett County, who has chosen not to run for reelection, the field of Democrats has not developed in kind. Shelby County assistant District Attorney Michael McKusker had indicated an interest in running but late last week bowed out, saying, “Simply put, I do not believe I can properly balance both the demands of my career and my family life with a campaign of this magnitude