Categories
News News Feature

Social Security: Choosing When to Claim

One of the most difficult decisions around retirement is when you choose to take your Social Security benefits. Deciding when to claim Social Security can make a difference in your monthly bottom line early in retirement and also influence your opportunity for a secure financial future later in life. Here are a few things to consider.

Before You Retire

Your monthly Social Security Benefit amount is calculated based on the number of years you have worked and the taxes you have paid into the Social Security Benefits program. Social Security counts the years you have paid taxes as “credits” for years that you have worked. For example, if you were born in 1929 or afterward, you must have 40 credits to receive Social Security benefits when you retire. This is equal to about 10 years of work.

Your benefit amount is also calculated by the number of credits you have earned during your working years. Fortunately, the Social Security Administration has made verifying your expected benefits easier by setting up an online account. It is worth double-checking your earnings to catch errors and factor in your expected benefits as you strategize for retirement.

What Age Should You Claim?

Several ages should be considered when deciding when to claim Social Security.

Early Retirement Age: The earliest age you can claim Social Security benefits is 62. However, if you claim Social Security early, you will be penalized for not waiting until the full retirement age via reduced benefits.

Full Retirement Age: This is the age when you are eligible to receive the full amount of your Social Security benefits. The full retirement age is calculated based on the year you were born. For example, for those born between 1943 and 1954, the full retirement age was 66. If you were born between 1955 and 1960 or beyond, the full retirement age rises to 67.

Delayed Retirement Age: You can also delay the claim of your retirement benefits until age 70. If you wait until then, you will continue accruing opportunity for higher monthly income when you do retire. However, potential benefits stop increasing at age 70, so there is likely not any good reason to delay the claim of benefits past age 70.

Deciding when to claim Social Security benefits is important as you approach your retirement age. Cases can be made for taking Social Security early, late, or any time in between, but without looking at your comprehensive financial picture it’s hard to use any particular rule of thumb. The interplay between Social Security, Medicare, and other retirement decisions can have a major impact on your financial future, and sometimes you can’t easily undo decisions if you make the wrong choice!

There is a lot of information available online about Social Security, but of course we believe it’s wise to engage an advisor with experience and tools to help you make the right decision for you — and more importantly, be confident in that decision.

Gene Gard is Chief Investment Officer at Telarray, a Memphis-based wealth management firm that helps families navigate investment, tax, estate, and retirement decisions. Ask him your questions or schedule an objective, no-pressure portfolio review at letstalk@telarrayadvisors.com. Sign up for the next free online seminar on the Events tab at telarrayadvisors.com.

Categories
News News Feature

Investing to Retire

When I look at the approximate amount of money I think I need to retire, I calculate that I’ll need to save half my take-home income for 60 years so that I can plan for 30 years with the same spending after I stop working. How does anyone manage to save enough to retire?

A: The most obvious good news here is that you don’t have to replace your income. In this highly simplified case, if you are working for a lifetime with a 50 percent savings rate, you only have to replace half your income because you were living on half your salary the whole time! This example is extreme, but even when a typical worker considers things like their 401k contributions, taxes paid, and money spent on commuting and business attire, they realize there’s no need to replace 100 percent of nominal salary in retirement to have the exact same lifestyle as today.

It’s true that if you had to save every dollar you need for retirement before you retire, you would need to work for a very long time. We are very fortunate that today we enjoy the power of capital markets which allows us to buy stocks and bonds to earn meaningful, real returns after inflation. For the last 50 years, U.S. large cap stocks have returned about 10 percent per year, which was a tremendous tailwind to the balance of investment accounts. By staying invested during your working years, your portfolio can grow much more quickly than money in a savings account. In fact, by mid to late career, it’s common to see market gains in a typical year far exceed the magnitude of contributions into retirement accounts.

Note that we didn’t say stocks have yielded 10 percent a year. There’s a strong instinct among investors and particularly retirees to “live on the interest” by spending bond interest and dividend income but never touching the principal in their investments. That probably comes from a time when retirees could buy intermediate term bonds and enjoy 5 percent-plus yields, which is not the case today. Today’s lower yields, rise of stock buybacks, and relatively low capital gains tax rate mean that dividends might actually not be the most desirable way to enjoy retirement returns. Retirees should definitely not be concerned about selling a small portion of the investment portfolio to fund annual expenses.

But how much money do you actually need? Every situation is different, but a general rule of thumb is that you only need to save about 25 times your annual spending in order to retire. A famous paper, known as the Trinity study, suggests that in the first year of retirement a retiree can spend 4 percent of the value of their investment portfolio, then continue spending that same amount indefinitely, adjusted each year for inflation. Markets will go up and down, and spending in retirement will likely rise and fall at different times, but the paper suggests (and our Observatory process confirms) that using this approach means a retiree would have been very unlikely to run out of money during most historical periods with good available data that we can test.

To answer the question directly, people retire by living below their means, investing the extra money in diversified portfolios, and staying invested in a prudent diversified allocation throughout retirement.

Retirement can be an overwhelming subject, so the peace of mind from a well-tested financial plan can be just as important as the details of the plan itself. Rules of thumb are useful but don’t tell the whole story, so at Telarray, we are always excited to use our proprietary Observatory process to help show you what that process might look like for you. You might find that with good practices you won’t need to work nearly as long as you think!

Gene Gard is Chief Investment Officer at Telarray, a Memphis-based wealth management firm that helps families navigate investment, tax, estate, and retirement decisions. Ask him your questions or schedule an objective, no-pressure portfolio review at letstalk@telarrayadvisors.com. Sign up for the next free online seminar on the Events tab at telarrayadvisors.com.

Categories
News News Feature

Is It (Really) Time for a New Car?

Memphis is a car town, no doubt about it. While it’s possible to exist here without one, nobody would say it’s convenient. For many, simply maintaining reliable transportation to get to and from school and work is a challenge that must be supported by an unscrupulous network of used car dealers, predatory lenders, and insurance companies catering to the less affluent and creditworthy market.

If you’re caught in that cycle, there’s not much we can offer in a brief article to help you. But for many car owners, rethinking your relationship with cars could make a major difference in your long-term financial picture.

Cars are uniquely positioned at the intersection of transportation, identity, and status. It can turn into a cycle: When the car gets paid off (or the lease expires), a new car quickly arrives in the driveway. Car payments seem to be a permanent bill, just like rent or mortgage, taxes, insurance, and utilities. Five-year car loans are now standard and terms stretch to 72, 84, or even 96 months, so it’s no surprise that car payments never seem to go away.

But is this cycle really necessary?

One justification for a new car is that it’s too expensive to maintain an old car. While this is true toward the end of a vehicle’s life, there’s a lot of time between the end of a 36,000-mile warranty and the 100,000 to 200,000 problem-free miles most cars enjoy today. Short of catastrophic failure, most maintenance issues from reliable brands rarely cost more than $500 to $1,000 to fix. That’s in the range of one to two months of typical car payments, which means you can pay for an awful lot of maintenance before it really makes sense to buy a new car.

Another justification for an endless treadmill of new cars is safety. It’s true that cars from previous decades don’t have features like airbags, shoulder belts, and highly engineered crumple zones that have reduced traffic fatalities so dramatically in recent years. However, a lot of money is spent in the name of safety for a few years of improvements that have marginal utility at best.

Finally, some people say they have to have a certain level of car for career reasons. This might be true for real estate agents who drive clients around all day. Then again, they also are likely able to deduct their lease payment as a business expense. The vast majority of business colleagues and clients will neither notice nor care if you drive a 10-year-old Camry or a brand-new Mercedes.

I was listening to a podcast recently about marketing to affluent households. The guest talked about how they use ownership and registration data to identify households with expensive vehicles — and then exclude them from the marketing plan! The reason? In a given population (in this case, people living in high-income ZIP codes), the people who actually have money in the bank tend to be the ones who don’t spend it on depreciating assets like sports cars, boats, and recreational vehicles.

You might be thinking: “That’s great, but what are we supposed to do without cars in places like Memphis without good public transportation?” I always smile when I hear this because people who say this generally have not earnestly looked into our MATA buses, trolleys, and on-demand services like Ready! and Groove.

All that may not be for you, but along with the backup plan of commercial ride-sharing services, these services can be a real alternative to a car. I discovered a while back that an almost perfectly direct bus route connected my house to my workplace, and I still remember fondly the years of paying a couple dollars a day to read the paper rather than fighting traffic.

At the end of the day, some people simply like to have new cars, and that’s their choice. But even slight mindset shifts can pay big dividends, like a family deciding to get by with an older car or even fewer total cars.

Lots of people spend a lot of time justifying a need to buy new cars. Spend some of that energy toward justifying older, cheaper, and fewer cars in your life — you’ll likely see profound differences in your financial outcome.
Have a question or topic you’d like to see covered in this column? Contact the author at ggard@telarrayadvisors.com. Gene Gard is Co-Chief-Investment Officer at Telarray, a Memphis-based wealth management firm that helps families navigate investment, tax, estate, and retirement decisions.

Categories
News News Feature

When Should You Take Social Security?

As we head into the last stretch of summer, my thoughts go to my favorite part of August — my birthday! This year, I will be one year away from my ability to start drawing my Social Security benefit, albeit reduced since I would be starting at the earliest age of 62. And so I will begin the decision-making process: Should I draw, or do I wait?

Let’s start with a quick synopsis of Social Security. If you have earned income, you pay a percentage of that income into the Social Security system. The amount that you contribute over time will dictate what your monthly benefit will be when you begin receiving payments. Your primary insurance amount (PIA) is the benefit you will receive if you begin benefits at your normal retirement date (also known as your full retirement age, or FRA).

Kathy Williams

Let’s pretend I was born in 1960. Currently, if you were born in 1960 or later, your FRA is 67. What if I want to start receiving my benefits as early as possible, which is at the age of 62? Since this is five years prior to my FRA, Social Security will reduce my benefits a little for each month that I begin receiving benefits before age 67. Why? Because they will be paying me a benefit for a longer period of time than if I waited until my full retirement age of 67. A five-year (60-month) reduction is 30 percent of FRA. If my age 67 benefit is $1,000 per month, my age 62 benefit will drop by 30 percent to $700 per month. Except for certain circumstances, this is a permanent reduction in my benefit. Yikes!

What if I want to get a bigger Social Security benefit? Maybe my handsome husband is rich and I don’t need to begin taking benefits until later. Well, Social Security has a plan for that, too. For each year that I defer taking my benefit past my FRA of 67 up to age 70, I will get an 8 percent increase in my monthly check, guaranteed! This would amount to a 24 percent bump, which is a fun benefit … if I live that long. Of course, I can start any time during that three-year period and still get the raise for the months I defer.

Here is the easy math: If I begin my benefit at FRA of 67, I will get $1,000 per month. If I begin my benefit at age 62, I will get $700 per month. And if I begin my benefit at age 70, I will get $1,240 per month. How do I know which door I should choose? The only way I can give you a definitive answer is if I know exactly when I am going to die. That makes the math very easy. Other than that, my life and lifestyle will hopefully give me enough clues to make an educated decision. Here are some things I will consider:

How much money do I have saved?

How much money do I spend?

How much money should I spend?

What other income will I have during retirement?

Am I married?

Am I divorced?

Am I still working?

How’s my health?

The answers to these questions will help steer me to the optimal option available for my circumstances. I shouldn’t assume that starting at age 62 always makes the most sense “before Social Security runs out of money.” Nor should I assume that waiting to the age of 70 will always make the most sense. I would recommend consulting with my personal wealth strategist (me) to help devise my plan, and would advise you to do the same.

Kathy Williams, CFP, CDFA, is Principal and Senior Wealth Strategist at Waddell & Associates. She can be reached at kathy@waddellandassociates.com.