Categories
Cover Feature News

The Sound of Success

Kenneth Crawford is packing his bags. He’s not singing the blues. But he is singing.

“I’m headed to the White House and singing on Saturday with my college choir,” Crawford says. He’s a student at Wiley College in Marshall, Texas, and his choir is headed to the White House in Washington, D.C., for the second time. Crawford is a graduate of the Soulsville Charter School in Memphis, and he is on a full-ride scholarship to Wiley College.

Crawford’s success is one story. But the truth is that there are many success stories emerging from the area’s school music programs. It’s nothing new, but it’s seldom noticed among the naysaying and the never-ending chorus of complaints and arguments about schools. The importance of music education sometimes gets lost, as we celebrate rock and soul music on the marquee. But music education has deep roots in Memphis and remains a vibrant force for good. Music is alive and well in our schools.

It’s time to take note.

“I had two young ladies who started playing trumpet in the 10th grade,” says Ollie Liddell, director of bands at Central High School and previously at East High. “Most people start playing an instrument in the sixth grade. I worked really hard with them, and they were able to get a scholarship their senior year just upon their work. So it’s possible, even at that late age, to get a scholarship in band. But it depends on the child and what level of work ethic they have.”

Liddell knows this not only firsthand but also second-generation.

“My father was the director of bands at Jackson State for almost 20 years,” Liddell says. “He retired in 2011. Without a band scholarship, he wouldn’t have been able to go to school. I didn’t come up from nothing. But he did. My dad went on a band scholarship.”

Liddell himself benefited from music education.

“I would have been able to go to college on an academic scholarship, but I would not have been able to stay on campus,” he says. “Then, midway through my sophomore year, I had a daughter and lost my academic scholarship. Without that band scholarship, I wouldn’t have made it through college.”

This musical path to success is working all over Memphis for lots of otherwise underserved kids.

“If you look at [scholarship] availability, [music] is what’s easiest,” Liddell says. “It takes time, effort, and work. But the money is out there, and band scholarships are readily available. I make a promise to every student: If they come to school and do what they are supposed to do, they can get a scholarship.

“It’s easier to get a band scholarship than a football or basketball scholarship,” Liddell says. “There are more scholarships offered per college program. Football in Division I only offers 70 or 80 scholarships. Basketball? Fifteen. In a band, you can have over 200 kids on scholarship, depending on the school’s program.

“One thing we do at Central is require all seniors to audition for scholarships,” Liddell says. “We set a goal. I did the same at East. Many of them are receiving a college education based on band scholarships.”

Historically, music has been a driving force for Memphis. The blues are the city’s pedigree, its claim to fame. Memphis’ tourism industry is based on its musical history. People have been coming to Beale Street for music long before the NBA came to town. African Americans on their way out of the Delta created a musical culture that still draws visitors from all over the world. Now, music culture is creating opportunities for at-risk and underserved Memphians. In fact, music may be one of the best ways to address the city’s big-picture problems: poverty and a lack of education.

In November, the Stax Music Academy hosted the Berklee City Music Network Conference, which brought together nonprofit music programs like the Stax Music Academy from all over the country. Administrators and teachers got together for networking and brainstorming at the Westin Hotel on Beale Street. The speakers were no strangers to the problems facing America’s cities.

Sandra Bowie is the executive director for arts education at the National Urban Alliance. She developed scholarship paths for underserved kids at New York University’s Tisch School of the Arts before taking her current job, located in Newark, New Jersey. She has been on the education front lines for decades and knows that there are capable, talented kids who can’t afford the next step in attaining the American dream.

“Colleges and universities cost so much money,” Bowie says. “We need programs like this to be connected to the colleges and universities. The child’s role is to find in themselves their own capacity and build that and their discipline. But we don’t have a system for doing that. There are a lot of children who are losing their lives because they are undereducated. They become underemployed and overincarcerated. This is a national crisis.”

Certainly, some aspects of the benefits of music education have been exaggerated: The “Mozart Effect” — making babies smarter by playing them classical music — has been oversold. But serious research abounds on the effects music has on the brain, even after childhood and adolescence and into adulthood.

A 2012 study in the Journal of Neuroscience found that “adults who received formal music instruction as children have more robust brainstem responses to sound than peers who never participated in music lessons. … Our results suggest that neural changes accompanying musical training during childhood are retained in adulthood.”

A 2013 study in Progressive Brain Research confirmed the benefits of music education: “The beneficial effects of musical training are not limited to enhancement of musical skills, but extend to language skills. … Taken as a whole, these findings suggest that musical training can provide an effective developmental educational strategy for all children.”

Cognitive benefits aside, music education has made a tremendous practical difference for many generations of Memphians and continues to provide a path for advancement not only in the private schools and charter academies but in our public schools as well.

“This is a time of high-stakes accountability,” says Dru Davidson, the fine arts adviser to the Shelby County Schools (SCS) system and former chair of arts education for Memphis City Schools (MCS). “We have 100 percent instruction in K through 5 in Shelby County Schools. Every child in a public school in the SCS receives music education. There are 100,000 kids served.”

In fact, it’s law in Tennessee, thanks to Title 49, Chapter 10, Part 6 of the annotated code. Formerly SB 2920, the bill was sponsored in 2008 by Memphis state senators Beverly Marrero and Ophelia Ford and reads: “The course of instruction in all public schools for kindergarten through grade eight (K-8) shall include art and music education to help each student foster creative thinking, spatial learning, discipline, craftsmanship, and the intrinsic rewards of hard work.”

“There’s not much like it at the state level, especially for elementary schools,” Davidson says. “We’re not doing it because it’s the law but because it’s a great idea.”

Not every kid will succeed in college. But those who make it to that level, if only for a while, learn something about how to set goals for themselves. It’s a net positive. The skills of collaboration and self-expression are essential to success at any level.

“Most of these kids are not going to play in orchestras for the rest of their lives,” says Carol Johnson, former superintendent of the Minneapolis, Memphis, and Boston school districts and a panelist at the Berklee City Music Conference. “But the athletes aren’t [going to be playing sports all their lives] either. Here is another pathway for them to learn something that is a lifelong joy.”

Johnson recalls an evening during her Memphis tenure when the benefits of music education revealed themselves to her firsthand.

“We had an orchestra performance of Memphis City Schools students at the Cannon Center. There was one child who didn’t have a ride home. This student was a ninth-grader from Frayser. His parents had not come to hear him perform. He played the cello. I said to him, ‘How did you get interested in the cello?’ He said, ‘I never knew what the cello was. I never knew about the orchestra. When I went to high school, one of my music teachers asked if I’d like to learn the cello. I just said yes. I can’t believe it. Here I am playing at the Cannon Center tonight.'”

“So when you think about it, it makes you want to cry. His parents didn’t even come. He didn’t have a ride home. His life chances are pretty difficult to imagine. Nobody in his family had gone to college.

“We need to nurture the talents that people have, to engage them in positive ways. If we fail to do so, it’s a lost opportunity. It’s lost not in just the musical sense, but in whether they will be useful participants in the democracy. They are getting a college opportunity and getting doors opened to them. This kid who was at the Cannon Center: What is the likelihood, growing up in Frayser, that he attends anything at the Cannon Center? It’s very low. His parents didn’t have discretionary income. They were intermittently homeless. What is it that keeps him grounded? He was very proud of playing the cello, that sense of accomplishment carries over.”

But music education offers more than anecdotal benefits. It’s one of the best values the district — and the city — has in terms of return on investment.

“MCS students earned $6.1 million in scholarships for music,” Davidson says of the last available annual figures for the now-defunct district. “It’s about the return on investment — allocating the budget, getting instruments that work, maintaining them. It’s a lot less money spent than the scholarships [bring in].

“The message is to develop 21st-century skills,” Davidson says. “Employers want people who are creative, innovative, and collaborative. We corner the market in creative skills. When kids are engaged in that, they will be one of the valuable people that employers want.”

Investment measures aside, Davidson is proud of the musical legacy of MCS and the work being done under SCS.

“Melrose is currently in a renaissance,” he says. “They are doing amazing work. Whitehaven has one of the top marching show bands in the country.”

Overton High School is the district’s official Creative and Performing Arts Academy. Principal Brett Lawson is himself a beneficiary of musical education. He sees music and arts instruction as essential pedagogical tools.

“When you study something that deeply, it teaches you how to learn,” he says. “You become not just a musician but someone who can learn to do something really well. That’s not automatic. You don’t come out of the womb knowing how to play the French horn. You have to work at it. You are hardwired to walk and talk, but the other things that people have to do to succeed in this world require effort. As a matter of fact, most things require effort. Our students are learning a skill at a very deep level. That’s what I’m looking for, and it translates to scholarships later on.”

In 2011, 26 students from Overton High School were offered $591,810 in music and art scholarships. Sixty-four students were offered academic scholarships totalling more than $2.2 million. The University of Memphis, for example, offered more than $1.2 million in music performance scholarships to more than 100 students last year.

A walk through the Overton campus is like getting baptized in the river. It’s profoundly inspiring to watch kids play together as an orchestra. We’re bombarded with musical noise all the time, but the sound of people playing together in real time and in real space has an immediate connection to our brains. To watch and listen to a performance is to be part of something.

And performing together is what Memphians need to learn to do more often.

“There’s a special thing that’s being put out from this campus,” says Justin Merrick, artistic and operations director for the Stax Music Academy. “These are music ambassadors who speak strongly and have a strong connection. They will be financial leaders as well and will be able to help build the communities of music for tomorrow.”

Memphis has problems, and we like to talk about them. In fact, problem analysis might be our civic pastime. But focusing on the negative eats away at us as people and as Memphians. This is especially true when it comes to discussing education — so much so that it’s sometimes hard for Memphians to imagine something wonderful coming from their schools. But a closer look — and a listen — might convince you otherwise.

Correction: There was an error in the print edition. The number of students receiving music scholarships is not greater than those receiving athletic scholarships. The point is that a typical band offers more scholarships than any particular sport or team at a university. We regret the error. — JB

Categories
Letters To The Editor Opinion

Letters to the Editor

Schools Redux Redux

I laughed while reading David Pickler’s self-serving whine (Viewpoint, November 27th issue) about how Germantown deserves not to be “deprived” of its neighborhood schools. This sentence comes after he’s spent 500 words rewriting recent history to blame all the problems on the Memphis City Schools board, rather than copping to the fact that he started the ball rolling in the first place or, at the very least, accepting some portion of the blame for this mess. That would have been gracious (and true).

Plenty of evidence has come out that Germantown leaders originally were leery of committing to educating students not living in the Germantown city limits, so who can blame the new board for being skeptical of their plans for the future?

Payback is a bitch, David.

David Pickler

Nancy Reynolds

Memphis

My son will soon graduate from a Shelby County Schools (SCS) high school. He started his high school career at a Memphis City Schools (MCS) high school. But he didn’t transfer. He is still attending the same school where he started, with the same teachers, the same school colors, the same team nickname, the same problems, the same points of excellence.

We have spent three years, thousands of meeting hours, millions of dollars, miles of newsprint, and billions of wasted words on an issue that has split this community in half — to change one letter.

I can spell “stupid.” Too bad our “leaders” can’t.

C.L. Williams

Memphis

As a lifelong educator, I find it troubling to see what is happening in public education in regards to assessing students. I recently attended a public forum on this topic in Jackson, Tennessee. There, I found more evidence why we need to reevaluate what we are doing in Tennessee with regard to testing.

I listened while students and parents told of testing anxiety to the point that children were becoming physically ill from the pressure to do well on standardized tests. Teachers expressed concern about the amount of time being spent on preparing students for the tests. In many cases, as much as six weeks of instruction time is lost to preparing students for standardized tests. That doesn’t include the time required to administer the tests. If students were to go through K-12 in Tennessee with the current testing structure and take each class with an end-of-course exam, they would have to take 32 standardized tests by the end of their schooling.

Tennessee spent $40 million on testing in 2013. The new PARCC Assessment is being developed for the next school year and is currently funded by a $186 million Race to the Top grant. All of these tax dollars for testing are going to out-of-state vendors, rather than staying in our state to help children.

I serve as a county commissioner and sit on the budget committee. My county could use more help from the state in providing the basics that our students need — textbooks, technology, science labs, career technology programs, and buildings. I work at a school that has as many as 15 floating teachers in any given year, because there are not enough classrooms.

I am not opposed to assessments, but it has clearly gotten out of hand. Assessments shouldn’t be the sole indicator of success. Tennessee is now making student scores a major part of teacher evaluation, while approximately 60 percent of educators teach in untested areas. Additionally, the state board has tied teachers’ licensing to assessment scores. Many of Tennessee’s finest educators are either retiring or looking for other careers, because they are being set up for failure.

We are entering uncharted waters in Tennessee public education. Most of the school reform is being advocated by outside sources that will benefit financially. The quality and depth of learning is being sacrificed in Tennessee for an assessment score. Nothing will change until parents begin to say enough is enough. Please express your concerns to your governor, state legislators, state education commissioner, and Tennessee State Board of Education representative.

Jeff Lipford

President, McNairy County Education Association

Categories
News News Blog

SCS Superintendent Talks $48.4 Million In Missing Equipment

More than $48 million worth of school equipment is missing from Shelby County Schools.

The jaw-dropping amount was discovered after ProBar, a Maryland-based company, conducted an audit on both Memphis City Schools and Shelby County Schools prior to the merger. The company was unable to account for more than 54,000 pieces of equipment, which retails for $48.4 million of taxpayers’ money.

SCS district superintendent Dorsey Hopson held a media briefing on Tuesday, December 3rd to discuss the results of the inventory audit. During the briefing, Hopson said one of the SCS board’s primary objectives is finding out whether or not there is a particular school, warehouse, or building that has an extraordinarily high amount of equipment missing.

“We’ve got to do a deep-dive,” Hopson said. “There are still unanswered questions. There’s still inventory that’s missing. We’re directing staff to go back and keep looking, to see if there’s other stuff that they can find. Once we get a handle on what we have and what we don’t have, we’re going to look and see if there are hotspots. Are there places where there’s an extraordinary amount of things missing? And then we’re going to see if there is someone even still here that’s responsible.”

According to ProBar’s audit information, MCS suffered a 23 percent (more than 44,000 items) equipment loss over a 30-year period. SCS suffered a 18 percent (more than 10,000 items) loss over the same time frame.

Hopson said he thinks the missing equipment could be attributed to theft and poor inventory record keeping. He said if it’s determined that a person has taken equipment or “grossly mismanaged” items, job termination could be a potential disciplinary action taken as a result.

“We want to find what we know we have, but that does not veer away from the fact that we need to work on our internal control and make sure we are using our best efforts to safeguard what is essentially a taxpayers’ problem,” Hopson said.

Categories
Opinion Viewpoint

Hopson’s Choice

On Monday, when Shelby County commissioner Chris Thomas decided not to offer his widely advertised motion for the commission to drop its litigation against the six suburban municipalities planning school systems, he was merely bowing to reality.

Several realities, in fact — beginning with the high probability that, even with the expected defection of Chairman James Harvey, a Democrat, from the ranks of lawsuit supporters, there was still a majority in favor of continuing with the lawsuit, consisting of six other Democrats and Republican Mike Ritz. That was enough to out-vote Thomas and the coalition of suburban Republicans that has steadfastly opposed the litigation. The best they could hope for was a 7-6 outcome against them.

Another reality confronting Thomas was last week’s unveiling by Dorsey Hopson, superintendent of the unified Shelby County Schools system, of a plan that resolved one basic issue in ongoing negotiations between the suburbs and the commission — that of who would administer to the unincorporated areas of Shelby County. Hopson’s answer was clear and categorical: The unified system would.

The superintendent’s plan also went far toward resolving the other basic question: What to do about the school properties within the six suburbs of Germantown, Collierville, Arlington, Lakeland, Bartlett, and Millington? Hopson’s choice was to insist on leasing the buildings to the municipalities — at a rate to be agreed on but one that, it was clear, would not be the nominal one desired by the municipalities.

As Hopson spelled that out Monday night, at the SCS board meeting that saw his plan overwhelmingly approved, the leases would be for 40 years, with all sorts of provisos regarding defaults and damages that put the onus of compliance on the suburbs.  

And, crucially, four schools on incorporated suburban turf would be retained by the united SCS system — Lucy Elementary School in Millington and three vintage institutions in Germantown: Germantown High School, Germantown Middle School, and Germantown Elementary.

As Germantown mayor Sharon Goldsworthy and others discovered when they appealed this verdict at Monday night’s SCS board meeting, there was virtually no chance of altering it. By state law, SCS is the official governing body for public education in Shelby County, it owns the school properties, and it has first dibs on their disposition. The rationale for selecting the particular four schools for retention by SCS was that the majority student population of each derived from the unincorporated areas, not from within the corporate limits of the host suburb.

Although Goldsworthy talked of conferring with her lawyers and continued to call for further discussions regarding the fate of the three Germantown schools — gaining a sliver of concession from Hopson that negotiations about the buildings (with him and board attorney Valerie Speakman) might conceivably touch on the issue — the chances of revision seemed remote.

The main reason for that was that no complaint was being heard from the other five affected suburban municipalities. Indeed, as SCS board member David Reaves of Bartlett explained somewhat apologetically when he declined Monday night to oppose the Hopson plan, “People in the north like this plan.” Mayor Mike Wissman of Arlington, a former board member and a bystander Monday night, confirmed that judgment.

The only board member voting against the Hopson plan was David Pickler, the former longtime chairman of the defunct all-suburban county school board, now a representative of Germantown. (And Collierville, too, though no grumbling about the plan was coming from that quarter.)

The once united front that could spur state Senate majority leader Mark Norris to seek remedial legislative action on behalf of the county’s suburban municipalities seemed irrevocably broken — a Humpty Dumpty that could not be patched back together.

It would appear that, after all the fire and brimstone and legislation and legal bickering, Hopson, the former attorney for Memphis City Schools and co-attorney for the provisionally unified system, had finally disposed of the central issues regarding the crisis-born school merger and the subsequent formation of municipal school systems. All that remains is some haggling over the cost of leasing school buildings.

Just in case, the county commission majority will almost certainly keep the existing lawsuit alive, though its linchpin, an accusation of resegregation, has been compromised somewhat by the Hopson plan’s de facto appropriation of minority students along Germantown’s unincorporated rim.

Presiding federal judge Hardy Mays, who has granted the litigating parties an additional 60 days to reach agreement, may soon be proclaiming an all-clear.

Jackson Baker is a Flyer senior editor.

Categories
Politics Politics Feature

Beginning of the End?

The great war over the fate of Shelby County’s schools — one which has preoccupied activists of various kinds, the media, city, county, and state jurisdictions, and the judicial system — may soon be winding down.

And the winner is …

Dorsey Hopson

Actually, that’s a matter of opinion. As matters stand, with the Shelby County Schools board’s adoption Monday night of a plan by Superintendent Dorsey Hopson, there are several parties that might proclaim victory: the SCS board itself; the Shelby County Commission, whose majority has been litigating against the six suburban municipalities hatching independent school systems; and the majority of those municipalities, which seem satisfied with the plan.

If there is a loser, it is Germantown, which sees the territorial integrity of its municipal school system compromised by the absorption of three namesake schools — Germantown High School, Germantown Middle School, and Germantown Elementary — into the unified Shelby County Schools system.

Hopson announced his plan last week, and victory peals or alarm bells (depending on the source) began sounding almost instantaneously. But the outcome was not formalized until Monday night, when the SCS board finally sat in judgment over the plan.

Most unusually for a school board meeting of whatever jurisdiction, the evening’s main drama was not delayed by curricular or procedural minutiae at the jam-packed business session in the Coe Administration Building on Avery. Germantown, whose officials and citizens showed up en masse to prevent it, saw the seven-member SCS board turn down its plea for retaining the three schools, or at least for more time to discuss it.

Referring to debate on the matter as “a conversation just begun,” Mayor Sharon Goldsworthy, said, “We respectfully ask, even urge, that you delay a definitive decision about the schools within the city of Germantown.” She thereby led a parade of several fellow townsfolk in the board’s opening public period, which also featured spokespersons for other causes, including the rescue of South Side High School from the state’s ASD system, over which the board had no control, and for a K-through-eight expansion at Barrett’s Chapel, over which it did have jurisdiction.

The Barrett’s Chapel folks got their way, those from South Side couldn’t, and those from Germantown didn’t — despite some eloquent testifiers, including a Houston High parent wearing a Germantown Red Devil pullover in solidarity, and the young son of Tim Coulter, who followed his father with the affectingly simple line, “Please don’t take my school” (an echo of the South Siders’ own plea, “Please don’t take our school away”).

40-year Leases for Each Municipality

After the public period was over, there were reports — from board chairman Kevin Woods, from the chairs of various committees, and finally, the crucial one, the superintendent’s report, delivered in Hopson’s flat and measured phrasing.

After a typically understated reference to the “extraordinary level of angst” that had afflicted all sectors of the county during the school merger controversy, followed by a brief statement of the good news for the Barrett’s Chapel contingent, Hopson detailed, city by city, his plan for the six incorporated suburbs that aim to have their own municipal school systems in August 2014.

Beginning with Arlington and proceeding through Bartlett, Lakeland, Millington, Germantown, and Collierville, Hopson read out his formula: a 40-year lease on terms to be negotiated for county school buildings currently within the cities’ municipal limits and with each city responsible for defaults and damages.

In only two cases was the number of leasable properties less than the number within those limits. As had been revealed in Hopson’s bombshell announcement last week, Shelby County Schools intends to maintain responsibility for Lucy Elementary School in a community newly annexed by Millington and for three namesake institutions in Germantown — Germantown High School, Germantown Middle School, and Germantown Elementary School.

As Hopson and other SCS spokespersons explained last week, the choice of institutions to be retained was dictated by the system’s decision — for financial and various logistical reasons — to provide public education for the unincorporated areas of Shelby County and for the school-age populations in those areas. The four institutions chosen all contained majorities of pupils living in the unincorporated areas. (In an interview, though, Goldsworthy would contest that fact for Germantown Elementary.)

“In a nutshell,” said Hopson, “I have authorized myself and Ms. [Valerie] Speakman [the board attorney]” as negotiators with the suburbs.

“In the North … People Like this deal”

The first board member to address the Hopson resolution was David Pickler, representative of Germantown and Collierville. Pickler expressed himself as “deeply troubled” by a plan that had not been submitted to an “open, fair, and public conversation” but had been engineered with “a very specific guiding of what the outcome had to be.”

Pickler then made a formal motion for the board to delay voting on the plan, pending “a more thought-out public process.”

Board chairman Woods asked if there was a second, and there was none — a fact causing several of the Germantown advocates in the audience, who had applauded Pickler lustily, to gasp or cry out in disbelief.

The reason would be made obvious when, after a ritual endorsement of “a very thoughtful resolution” by Memphis board member Teresa Jones, Bartlett member David Reaves, in a regretful but firm manner, lowered the boom. “In the north … most of the people like this deal,” he said. “I sympathize, but I represent the north.”

In a concession to Germantown sensibilities, Reaves did move to divide the board’s voting on the plan six ways, city by city. That motion failed 5-2, with only Reaves and Pickler voting for it.

Before the board’s vote on the Hopson resolution, former board chairman Billy Orgel, who had been honored earlier for his service during the board’s 23-member transitional phase, said he thought the Hopson plan would hasten a mutually agreeable resolution of the whole merger controversy. (Unmentioned Monday night was the fact of the ongoing county commission litigation against the municipalities’ school plans, still unsettled.)

Optional Status for Germantown Schools

Chairman Kevin Woods then posed a series of rhetorical questions to Hopson and attorney Speakman, addressing potentially contentious parts of the plan. That gave the superintendent the opportunity to note that the district would treat all three Germantown institutions as optional schools and that the staff and teachers at each would likely remain in place. For her part, Speakman affirmed that it was by no means unprecedented for schools within municipalities to function as parts of extraneous systems.

Pickler won one tenuous concession from Hopson — the superintendent’s somewhat tepid acknowledgment that theoretically the board, during negotiation, could consider revising the question of Germantown’s schools. The board then voted on Hopson’s plan, endorsing it 5-1-1, with Pickler the only no vote and Reaves politely abstaining.

In a colloquy with reporters later on, Goldsworthy talked of convening her lawyers and trying again to get public discussions on modification of the Hopson plan. She had no ready answer when asked if there was any legal alternative to acceptance of the board’s will. Asked if her city could run a viable school system minus the three affected schools and the state funding destined for students in the adjoining unincorporated area, she gamely suggested that, come what may, Germantown would succeed with its system.

Asked if there was any reason other than logistical for her city’s bearing the brunt of sacrifice in the Hopson plan, Goldsworthy only smiled cryptically. When her interviewer suggested he couldn’t interpret a smile, she answered, “Oh yes, you can.”

(For more on Superintendent Dorsey Hopson’s plan, see Viewpoint, p. 15.)

Categories
Politics Politics Beat Blog

Germantown Pitches to Retain All Its Schools, but the School Board Says No


Germantown Mayor Sharon Goldsworthy before the School Board”

Most unusually for a school board meeting — of whatever jurisdiction — the main drama was not delayed by curricular or procedural minutiae at a jam-packed business session Monday night. Germantown, whose officials and citizens showed up en masse at the Coe administration building on Avery, saw the seven-member Shelby County Schools board turn down its plea for retaining the three schools siphoned from it in superintendent Dorsey Hopson’s new school plan, or at least for more time to discuss it.

Referring to debate on the matter as “a conversation just begun,” Mayor Sharon Goldsworthy, said, “We respectfully ask, even urge, that you delay a definitive decision about the schools within the city of Germantown.” She thereby led a parade of several fellow townsfolk in the board’s opening public period, which also featured spokespersons for other causes, including the rescue of South Side High School from the state’s ASD system, over which the board had no control, and for a K-through-8 expansion at Barrett’s Chapel, over which it did.

The Barrett’s Chapel folks would get their way, those from South Side couldn’t, and those from Germantown didn’t, despite some eloquent testifiers, including the young son of Tim Coulter, who followed his father with the affectingly simple line, “Please don’t take my school” (an echo of the South Siders’ own plea, “Please don’t take our school away”).

40-year leases for each municipality

After the public period was over, there were reports — from board chairman Kevin Woods, from the chairs of various committees, and finally the crucial one, the superintendent’s report, delivered in Hopson’s flat and measured phrasing.

After a typically understated reference to the “extraordinary level of angst” that had afflicted all sectors of the county during the school-merger controversy, followed by a brief statement of the good news for the Barrett’s Chapel contingent, Hopson detailed, city by city, his plan for the six incorporated suburbs that plan to have their own municipal school systems in August 2014.

Beginning with Arlington and proceeding through Bartlett, Lakeland, Millington, Germantown, and Collierville, Hopson read out his formula — a 40-year lease on terms to be negotiated for county school buildings currently within the cities’ municipal limits, and with each city responsible for both defaults and damages.

In only two cases was the number of leasable properties less than the number within those limits. As had been revealed in Hopkins’ bombshell announcement last week, Shelby County Schools intends to maintain responsibility for Lucy Elementary School in a community newly annexed by Millington and for three namesake institutions in Germantown — Germantown High School, Germantown Middle School, and Germantown Elementary School.

As Hopson and other SCS spokespersons explained last week, the choice of institutions to be retained was dictated by the system’s decision — for financial and various logistical reasons — to provide public education for the unincorporated areas of Shelby County and for the school-age populations in those areas. The four institutions chosen all contained majorities of pupils living in the unincorporated areas. (In an interview, though, Goldsworthy would contest that fact for Germantown Elementary.)

“In a nutshell,” said Hopson, “I have authorized myself and Ms. [Valerie] Speakman [the board attorney]” as negotiators with the suburbs.

“In the north…people like this deal….”

First board member to address the Hopson resolution was David Pickler, representative of Germantown and Collierville. Pickler expressed himself as “deeply troubled” by a plan that had not been submitted to an “open, fair, and public conversation” but had been engineered with “a very specific guiding of what the outcome had to be.”

Pickler then made a formal motion for the board to delay voting on the plan, pending “a more thought-out public process.”

Board chairman Woods asked if there was a second, and there was none — a fact causing several of the Germantown advocates in the audience, who had applauded Pickler lustily, to gasp or cry out in disbelief.

The reason would be made obvious when, after a ritual endorsement of “a very thoughtful resolution” by Memphis board member Teresa Jones, Bartlett member David Reaves, in a regretful but firm manner, lowered the boom. “In the north…most of the people like this deal,” he said. “I sympathize, but I represent the north.”

In a concession to Germantown sensiibilties, Reaves did move to divide the board’s voting on the plan six ways, city by city. That motion failed 5-2, with only Reaves and Pickler voting for it.

Before the board’s vote on the Hopson resolution, former board chairman Billy Orgel, who had been honored earlier for his service during the board’s 23-member transitional phase, said he thought the Hopson plan would hasten a mutually agreeable resolution of the whole merger controversy. (Unmentioned Monday night was the fact of the ongoing County Commission litigation against the municipalities’ school plans, still unsettled.)

Optional status for Germantown schools

Chairman Kevin Woods then posed a series of rhetorical questions to Hopson and attorney Speakman, addressing potentially contentious parts of the plan. That gave the superintendent the opportunity to note that the district would treat all three Germantown institutions as optional schools and that the staff and teachers at each would likely remain in place. For her part, Speakman affirmed that it was by no means unprecedented for schools within municipalities to function as parts of extraneous systems.

Pickler won one tenuous concession from Hopson — the superintendent’s somewhat tepid acknowledgement that theoretically the board, during negotiation, could consider revising the question of Germantown’s schools. The board then voted on Hopson’s plan, endorsing it 5-1-1, with Pickler the only no vote and Reaves politely abstaining.

In a colloquy with reporters later on, Goldsworthy talked of convening her lawyers and trying again to get public discussions on modification of the Hopson plan. She had no ready answer when asked if there was any legal alternative to acceptance of the board’s will. Asked if her city could run a viable school system minus the three affected schools and the state funding destined for students in the adjoining unincorporated area, she gamely suggested that, come what may, Germantown would succeed with its system.

Asked if there was any reason other than logistical for her city’s bearing the brunt of sacrifice in the Hopson plan, Goldsworthy only smiled cryptically. When her interviewer suggested he couldn’t interpret a smile, she answered, “Oh yes, you can.”

Categories
Opinion

Achievement School District Getting Bigger, Maybe Better

GreatPictureofCarverHigh.jpg

The Achievement School District for low-performing schools in Shelby County will have eight or nine new members next year, including one high school that was targeted for closing.

The Innovation Zone, another new wrinkle in public education, will have five new schools.

The I-Zone schools are run by the school district. The ASD is a statewide, special school distrct. The I-Zone is a special group of schools, still under the auspices of the Shelby County school district, and run by its innovation department.

The new ASD schools include four elementary schools (Coleman, Denver, Springhill and Westwood), two middle schools (Southside and Wooddale), and two of these three high schools (Carver, Fairley, and Frayser). The two high schools were not identified. Carver has been targeted for closing due to low enrollment.

The Innovation Zone schools are Vance Middle, Grandview Heights Middle, Melrose High School, Hamilton High School, and Trezevant High School.

The announcement was made with some delicacy. Reporters were alerted Tuesday morning but asked to hold the story for release until Wednesday so that parents and faculty and staff at the targeted schools could be told first. The charter operators have not been chosen.

Both groups take schools in the bottom five percent in Tennessee for academic achievement. The goal is to move them into the top 25 percent within five years. Faculty and administration have to reapply for their jobs and may or may not be rehired. Families can opt out and attend another local public school instead. If they do nothing, they are assured of a spot in the ASD or Innovation Zone school in their attendance zone.

The schools have longer school days by an hour or more and some Saturday sessions. The pay scale for teachers is not based on tenure or experience but on student performance on tests. The pupil-teacher ratio is generally 25-1 or lower.

The inclusion of Carver is likely to raise issues about closing low-enrollment schools. The ASD could become a lifeline for such schools. Before it went out of existence, the Transition Planning Commission recommended closing 20 low-enrollment schools and identified several other candidates. The school board closed four of them.

(THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CORRECTED: An earlier version incorrectly stated that I-Zone schools will become charter schools.)

Categories
Opinion

Hopson and Pickler on New Board and Superintendent

Dorsey Hopson

  • Dorsey Hopson

If he has any qualms about being chosen as “permanent” Shelby County Schools superintendent by just 6 of the 23 board members he worked with for the last two years, Dorsey Hopson wasn’t talking about them Wednesday.

Asked if he could do a brief telephone interview, Hopson replied by email:

“I am deeply honored and humbled by the confidence that the board has shown in my leadership. We have so much work to do and I am excited about this once in a lifetime opportunity to lead and serve our community. We will have many challenges ahead but we will face them in a transparent and responsible way. I look forward to working with our board and the entire community.”

Hopson was legal counsel to Memphis City Schools under Dr. Kriner Cash and interim superintendent for a year. His contract details have yet to be worked out.

In its first meeting, the new “seven-member board” that is actually only six members until the seventh slot is filled, unanimously chose Hopson and told the superintendent search firm — which concluded after two months that a viable candidate could not be found given the uncertainty — the deal was done. One week ago the board had 23 members, and within a year it could have 13 members.

The ratio of students to board members in the county system is roughly 24,000-1.

David Pickler

  • David Pickler

The day after the superintendent selection, board member David Pickler was at a meeting of the National School Boards Association to discuss, among other things in the media announcement, “the lack of flexibility local public schools currently face.” He is president of the association.

Pickler said school boards in the association range in size from 3 to 23 members. He said the “ideal” size would be 5 to 9 members.

He said Hopson should have “at least a two-year contract and preferably three or four years.”

He said that if the suburbs leave the county system his district should still have representation on the county board because it includes parts of Cordova and the Southwind area that are not in Germantown. Pickler’s term ends September 1, 2014.

Categories
News News Blog

Our Children. Our Success Campaign Triumphs

Picture_4.png

From the back-to-school sales in store across the city and the look of distress on so many children’s faces, it’s clear that summer is coming to an end. As kids go back to school, many parents are having to come to terms with the fact that Memphis City Schools are no more.

Enter “Our Children. Our Success.,” a campaign aimed at making this change easier for the public to understand and accept. Over the summer, the campaign brought together various nonprofits to help convey information to Memphis parents and answer questions about what to expect this coming school year. Town meetings were held, billboards were set up,and television ads were aired.

Herchel Burton, spokesperson for the “Our Children. Our Success.” campaign, describes the campaign as nothing short of, well, a success. Burton believes the campaign’s constant planning, scheduling, strategizing, and discussions will help make this school year the best possible.

“Our plan is to make this school year as successful as possible. We realize there are going to be bumps in the road, but there are going to be bumps in the road regardless. All I can say is school will be open on August 5th, and students will be in classrooms” Burton said.

“Our Children. Our Success.” will continue to help the public through the school year. “Our goal is to ensure every child in Shelby County gets the best education possible. Feel free to communicate with the school and central office. We are here to support and help any way we can” Burton said.

Categories
Politics Politics Feature

Confronting the Unknown

Even as the fate of Shelby County’s schools was an inevitable and implicit backdrop to budget and tax negotiations on the Shelby County Commission (see below), six suburban municipalities were launched on their second effort to approve the separate suburban school systems that they are already collecting taxes for.

The municipalities of Germantown, Collierville, Bartlett, Lakeland, Arlington, and Millington all voted in 2012 in favor of establishing separate school systems for themselves in conformity with legislation in Nashville, as well as for the half-cent sales-tax increases to pay for them. The taxes would remain, but the school votes were nullified when U.S. district judge Hardy Mays found the authorizing legislation to be unconstitutional.

In this year’s legislative sessions, state senator Mark Norris and state representative Curry Todd, both Collierville Republicans, recast their former bills as applying statewide, and the suburbs were entitled to try again.

All six suburbs are expected to vote yes as before, in an election process that began with early voting last week and will conclude next Tuesday, July 16th.

For the time being, though, the Shelby County Unified School System holds sway throughout the county’s boundaries, though it shares its jurisdictional and geographic space with an array of charter schools and state-controlled special districts.

The old Memphis City Schools system officially expired on July 1st, and Shelby County Schools has expanded and metamorphosed into the (temporarily) unified system.

Though everyone expects the six new municipal districts to be in existence a year from now, with plans for eventual coalescence into some combination vaguely like the old SCS system, numerous issues remain unresolved — including the means of making over existing school properties to the suburbs, the fate of students in unincorporated areas, and the reshuffling of employee rosters when de-merger becomes necessary.

Commission chairman-elect James Harvey

• The fate of Shelby County’s schools was very much involved with the unforeseen developments and unexpected outcomes that marked the resolution of two vital matters by the county commission this week. These were the fate of county mayor Mark Luttrell‘s proposed $4.38 tax rate, which was rejected by the commission on third reading; and the selection of a new chairman for 2013-14, dark horse contender James Harvey.

The chairmanship issue was first on the agenda but ended up being deferred until a decision on the tax rate had been reached. That the two issues were related was clear, and Harvey’s victory, in a multi-ballot contest with current chairman Mike Ritz and Commissioner Steve Mulroy, undoubtedly owed something to his vote against the tax rate proposal.

The meeting had gotten under way with the nomination of Ritz, Mulroy, and Harvey, and, after several ballots had been taken on the chairmanship, it became obvious that the commission’s 13 votes were so evenly and unchangeably distributed among the three contenders that no immediate resolution was likely.

Though there were modest fluctuations from ballot to ballot, the votes conformed to a fairly rigid pattern.

Ritz, a Republican who during his year at the helm had essentially presided over a coalition with the commission’s seven Democrats, had solid commitments from Democrats Walter Bailey, who nominated him; Vice Chair Melvin Burgess; and Sidney Chism, along with Republican Steve Basar.

Democrat Mulroy, though he has in his two terms carved out a reputation as the commission’s leading liberal, began the voting with a solid corps of supporters from the body’s Republican right wing — Heidi Shafer, who nominated him; Chris Thomas; and Wyatt Bunker.

This odd-looking allegiance was based on those Republicans’ wish to have done with Ritz, from whom they are estranged, along with a sense that the victory of a Democrat, together with his support for restoring the pattern of alternating annual chairmanships between Republicans and Democrats, was desirable.

Democrat Harvey, an independent-minded eccentric with a spotty attendance record and a habit of making rambling speeches on issues during which he seemingly changes his position back and forth, was something of a variable. He was nominated by Terry Roland, the gonzo Republican from Millington, who nurses grievances against both Ritz and Mulroy, and got support from Democrats Henri Brooks and Justin Ford, two other freebooters famous for keeping their own counsel.

Once the fact of impasse was recognized and the commission shelved the chairmanship matter temporarily to deal with the tax rate, discussion turned rancorous, with Democrat Bailey denouncing opposition to the Luttrell formula as ideologically driven “political posturing” and actually proposing an additional 4 cents for the schools, while Shafer and Bunker took turns mocking what they characterized as a faux annual funding urgency and proposed a return to the previous year’s $4.02 tax rate, based on overall property-value assessments that have since declined.

The key moment in the debate came early when Harvey made it obvious that, as he had indicated in a recent committee meeting, he would not support the Luttrell tax rate, which he had favored on its initial reading last month. What had once appeared to be a slam-dunk prospect of passage for the tax rate unraveled further with the unexplained opposition of Justin Ford, another prior supporter.

There might still have been a chance of passing the $4.38 tax rate, which Luttrell, in a plea to the commission’s GOP contingent, characterized as consistent with responsible Republican conservatism, in that Basar, an on-the-fence Republican, was presumed to be willing to be the seventh vote for the tax rate if a sixth could be found.

But with Harvey and Ford both opting out, there remained only abject recuser Sidney Chism, who, concerned about conflict-of-interest charges being pressed against him by Roland on the basis of Chism’s receiving county wraparound funds for his day-care center, has declined to follow the defiant example of colleague Burgess, a consistent tax-rate supporter who was similarly accused by Roland on the basis of his receiving a county-funded school salary.

Thus it was that on the final tally the Luttrell tax rate failed, mustering only five votes and laying a serious challenge to the commission, which, as Ritz pointed out, has already begun the new fiscal year, committing funds that were budgeted on the assumption of the $4.38 tax rate — which is now at least temporarily defunct.

Between now and the next public meeting of the full commission on July 22nd, the commission must somehow find a new resolve — and a new coalition — on behalf of the Luttrell tax rate or arrive upon a new tax rate and, along with it, a hastily revamped budget.

One possibility, discussed late in Monday’s session and known to be advocated by Basar, is a tax rate of $4.32, the amount of the state-formulated “certified tax rate,” a formula which, given the latest property assessments, would provide the same amount of funding as the previous year’s. As Basar sees it, Luttrell’s proposed school funding would remain intact, with deductions in the county’s general fund amounting to some $10 million.

Ritz, now a lame-duck chairman and a supporter of the original Luttrell proposal, will bend his efforts to getting the best deal he can, while his successor, Harvey, awaits his moment of authority, which will come in September.

In a nutshell, once the tax-rate vote had been taken and the commission’s attention had returned to the chairmanship matter, the same deadlock prevailed as had been in place before, with neither Ritz nor Mulroy, the presumed main contenders, willing to yield. Finally, the impasse was broken in a chain reaction started by Basar, who switched off Ritz to go for Harvey, who only moments before had seemed an also-ran about to be eliminated.

Meanwhile, the corps of conservatives, who were determined above all to spurn Ritz and who had consistently supported Mulroy, a firm supporter of Luttrell’s tax-rate proposal, had apparently begun seeing Harvey, who had voted their way on the tax rate, as a plausible alternative and followed Basar’s lead.

There was a brief sequel to the chairmanship vote in a three-way contest for chairman pro tem between Mulroy, Shafer, and Basar. When Mulroy, who clearly was half-hearted about that office, which clearly is no longer a prelude to a next-year’s chairmanship, withdrew, Basar triumphed 7-6 over Shafer.