Categories
News News Blog News Feature

Tennessee Attorney General Sues NCAA Over NIL Ban

Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti along with the state of Virginia has filed a lawsuit against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA.) 

Skrmetti and others are suing the organization for “violating federal antitrust laws with its anticompetitive restrictions on the ability of current and future student-athletes to benefit from their name, image, and likeness (NIL).

“This Court should declare unlawful and enjoin the NCAA’s NIL-recruiting ban and allow this market—which already exists—to function fairly and competitively,” reads the lawsuit.

In a statement, Skrmetti argued that the NCAA’S NIL-recruiting ban violates federal antitrust law, thwarts the free market, and harms student-athletes.

“Student-athletes are entitled to rules that are clear and rules that are fair,” said Skrmetti. “College sports wouldn’t exist without college athletes, and those students shouldn’t be left behind while everybody else involved prospers. The NCAA’s restraints on prospective students’ ability to meaningfully negotiate NIL deals violate federal antitrust law. Only Congress has the power to impose such limits.”

The Supreme Court ruled that the NCAA had violated antitrust law in the case of NCAA v. Alston. In June of 2021, the NCAA adopted an interim policy that allowed athletes to benefit from their NIL. When this policy was initially announced, then-NCAA President Mark Emmert said they would be working with Congress to develop more solutions on a national level.

At the time of the announcement, Emmert said “the current environment – both legal and legislative – prevents us from providing a more permanent solution and the level of detail student-athletes deserve.”

“After the Supreme Court ruled that the NCAA violated antitrust law by imposing unreasonable restraints on the compensation college athletes may receive, Tennessee and other states enacted laws to foster a thriving NIL market for the benefit of student-athletes,” said Skrmetti. “Contrary to those state laws, the NCAA has adopted a shifting and opaque series of rules and guidelines that thwart the ability of student-athletes to get fair compensation for their NIL.”

Under current NCAA rules, athletes are allowed to engage in NIL activities that are “consistent with the law of the state where the school is located.” They are also allowed to use a professional service for NIL activities.

However, under these same rules, prospective athletes are prohibited from “discussing potential NIL opportunities prior to enrolling. They are also unable to review offers before they enroll at their university.

The lawsuit alleges that these restrictions “violate the Sherman [Anti-Trust] Act, harm the States and the welfare of their athletes, and should be declared unlawful and enjoined.”

“Student-athletes generate massive revenues for the NCAA, its members, and other constituents in the college sports industry—none of whom would dare accept such anticompetitive restrictions on their ability to negotiate their own rights,” said Skrmetti. “Student-athletes shouldn’t be left behind while everyone else profits from their achievements.”

Categories
News News Blog News Feature

State Attorney General’s Budget Up $2.2M to Fight Feds, Cities

Facing a spate of legal battles with Tennessee cities and the federal government, the Attorney General’s Office enters this year with a new “strategic litigation unit” and heftier budget.

As part of a $56.2 billion budget for fiscal 2023-24, the Legislature approved 10 more positions at a cost of $2.25 million for Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti.

That gives the office a $52.95 million payroll for 363 positions with an average salary of $146,600. Including operating costs, the office’s budget will hit nearly $6.75 million on July 1, up almost 9 percent from this year’s total. The total includes $5.1 million from a market adjustment recommended by the Ernst & Young study conducted for executive department pay.

That figure also contains $5,078,500 for a grab bag of legal expenses such as filing fees, expert witness expenses and contracts, in addition to outside counsel on a wide variety of cases ranging from opioid litigation to TennCare investigations. The office spent $5 million on those items this fiscal year, matching the amount the state spent this year and $6 million in fiscal 2021-22.

The 10-attorney special unit was discussed in-depth during budget hearings, Chief of Staff Brandon Smith says, and will focus on “proactive litigation defending the separation of powers and the constitutional rights of Tennesseans, the defense of state laws presenting significant federalism issues, and pursue transparency and accountability for certain corporate activities that undermine the democratic process and harm consumers.”

Not a full year into the job, Skrmetti doesn’t necessarily have a different philosophy than his predecessor, Herbert Slatery, but appears to be taking a slightly more active role against what he considers federal incursions.

For instance, the Attorney General’s Office joined a national effort to stop President Joe Biden’s Administration from putting new regulations on ovens, stoves, dishwashers and refrigerators. Skrmetti also joined 23 states in requesting a court injunction on an Environmental Protection Agency rule to expand federal authority over bodies of water nationwide.

In yet another case, Skrmetti filed a brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit arguing against the Biden Administration’s attempt to make the abortion drug mifepristone available through the mail.

“Abortion is a matter of state law and Tennesseans, acting through their elected representatives, have chosen to prohibit elective abortions and to strictly regulate the use of abortion-inducing drugs such as mifepristone,” Skrmetti says.

The Attorney General’s Office also must deal with a challenge of the state’s new law prohibiting gender affirming care for minors, in addition to an injunction placed on the Legislature’s move to reduce the size of the Metro Nashville Council.

The Legislature’s critics, mainly House and Senate Democrats, are fond of saying the Republican-controlled chambers pass lawsuits, not legislation. Based on the Attorney General’s Office budget, they have a pretty solid argument.

Fresh off a three-year legal battle over the state’s Education Savings Accounts program, which provides public dollars to send low-income students to private schools, the state finds itself in another tussle with Metro Nashville over the new law to cut the Metro Council to 20 from 40. A state court judge put a temporary hold on that measure, forcing Skrmetti to issue a statement saying the state won’t appeal the decision but will allow the size of the council to take effect with the 2027 election.

Skrmetti contends the court left the 20-member cap on metropolitan councils intact when the majority concluded Metro’s plaintiffs are “not likely to succeed on their claim that it violates … the Tennessee Constitution.”

Metro Law Director Wally Dietz points out the trial court ruled unanimously that applying the council cut to this year’s election violates the Home Rule Amendment to the state Constitution. But while the court ruled 2-1 that Metro hasn’t proven its case on keeping the council at 40, the decision isn’t final.

Still expecting to prevail, Metro will make arguments against the cap that weren’t part of the initial injunction hearing. The court is expected to hold a hearing later this year.

Meanwhile, Metro Nashville’s legal office is concerned about other bills targeting the local government and is considering other possible lawsuits, according to Dietz. Those include measures to give top state officials control over appointments to the airport and sports authorities and dismantling a community oversight board that handles complaints against the police department.

Costs start to rise

Since Republican Gov. Bill Lee took office in 2019, the Attorney General’s Office has grown nearly every year. 

The fiscal 2019-20 budget had 341 positions for former Attorney General Herbert Slatery with a $36.18 million payroll and $1.56 million spent on outside counsel, compared to $6 million a year ago.

In the final year of Democratic Gov. Phil Bredesen’s administration, the Attorney General’s Office had 341 positions with a total cost of $30.24 million, including $1.16 million in special litigation costs.

Early in Republican Gov. Bill Haslam’s tenure, the AG’s Office cut personnel to 320 with a payroll of $24.7 million and special litigation of only $1.83 million in fiscal 2012-13. 

Since then, the number of attorneys working for the state has crept up, reflecting an increase in the amount of legal work.

Democratic lawmakers argue that much of the litigation is self-inflicted.

“It’s just the continued bad legislation that’s coming out of the General Assembly. I guess they need more attorneys to be able to defend the multiple lawsuits the General Assembly forces them into,” says state Rep. Bo Mitchell. “Whether it’s preventing children from getting health care to taking over the city of Nashville, it’s never-ending.”

Mitchell, a Nashville Democrat, says many of the attorney general’s tasks come at the direction of the Legislature. 

“It keeps coming back to the same place,” he says.

In fact, the attorney general does take direction from the governor and legislative leaders.

It’s just the continued bad legislation that’s coming out of the General Assembly. I guess they need more attorneys to be able to defend the multiple lawsuits the General Assembly forces them into.

– Rep. Bo Mitchell, D-Nashville

Skrmetti, however, made the call on his own to reach an agreement with a California firearms organization to lower Tennessee’s gun-carry age to 18 from 21 under the permit-less carry law. He then consulted the state’s top leaders.  

Rep. Charlie Baum, a member of the House finance committee, points out the Attorney General’s Office has a heavy workload, going after opioid distributors much as it once fought the tobacco industry, in addition to dealing with federal and local issues.

Skrmetti’s office recently announced Tennessee received a $163.9 million payment from major tobacco companies from a 1998 settlement that resolved the state’s lawsuit for violations of consumer protection laws and deceptive marketing practices. All told, the state has gotten $3.8 billion through the settlement.

The state also joins multiple lawsuits against the federal government where states are suing the federal government for items considered forms of “overreach” through its legislation and policies, Baum notes.

“These tend to be the red states that are the ones more apt to sue the federal government,” he says.

Baum also believes the state is running into higher legal costs, in part, because of “activist” judges, and he points toward the years-long litigation over private school vouchers as proof.

In that case, the Davidson County trial court and Tennessee Court of Appeals ruled the state violated the Home Rule Amendment by starting the voucher program in Metro Nashville and Shelby County school districts without getting local approval. The Tennessee Supreme Court, however, ruled in favor of the state using a technicality to enable the voucher program to take effect.

Tennessee Lookout is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Tennessee Lookout maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Holly McCall for questions: info@tennesseelookout.com. Follow Tennessee Lookout on Facebook and Twitter.

Categories
News News Blog News Feature

New AG, Same Old Conservative Partisanship

Tennessee’s new Attorney General, a former Memphian, is holding to the same conservative partisanship as his predecessor. 

Jonathan Skrmetti was sworn in as Tennessee’s 28th Attorney General on September 1st, beginning an eight-year term. He was appointed by the Tennessee Supreme Court in August. 

Skrmetti follows the death-sentence pushing, private-school-voucher loving, gender-identity discriminating, cannabis-law over-reaching, vaccine-mandate fighting, election-meddling, and gay-marriage opponent Herbert Slatery. 

From some of the first news releases (i.e. the stuff he wants the public to know about), Skrmetti seems like he’ll continue Slatery’s work. While the news release from his swearing-in ceremony had Skrmetti proclaiming he’d advocate “for the rights and freedoms of all Tennesseans,” he quickly went to work against some Tennessee school kids. 

Skrmetti carried on Slatery’s fight against a set of Biden-Administration rules that would allow federal protections for gender identity in school programs. Instead of fighting for “all Tennesseans” — like trans kids — Skrmetti claimed the protections would “promote sex-based discrimination and threaten constitutional rights.” The argument made it pretty clear Skrmetti aimed to fight for only some Tennesseans.

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee stopped the rules from going into effect in July. The U.S. Department of Education paused the regulations for a two-month period of public comment. Last week, Skrmetti led 19 other state AGs (from the usual bastions of “freedom for all” like Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas) in a letter to the feds, blasting the proposed rules. 

He said expanding Title IX, the landmark rule that bans sex-baed discrimination in schools, state university employees would be forced to use “certain pronouns and other referential terms.” This would violate the First Amendment, Skrmetti claimed. 

His letter wrings hands over who can play on what sports teams, giving science-sounding arguments on the differences in human bodies, and that new rules “would not be fair to female athletes.” 

As for “student and faculty safety,” Skrmetti’s letter contains the word “bathroom” 24 times. He frightens with some news stories and some court records that apparently prove that “public toilets … are often the locale of [numerous crimes].” He notes the Education Department “fails to recognize that its new rules will enable this nefarious conduct.”

Three days after attacking school equity, Skrmetti joined another multi-state effort to “demand” President Joe Biden label fentanyl a “Weapon of Mass Destruction.” While this move may be a bit more bipartisan (it had support form AGs in Guam, New Hampshire, Virginia, and Connecticut), the Bush-era language made it sound conservative. 

Fentanyl is a cheap, lethal synthetic opioid that is widely spreading and killing thousands. The AGs’ motivation to get the feds to help them stop its spread is plain. Their strategy to get there is not. They know this. In the letter, they said they understand the criticisms. It’s a drug control problem, not a weapons problem. Also, other than one Russian incident, no one has yet weaponized fentanyl. 

However, “the fact that classifying fentanyl would have an ancillary effect of preventing the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans would be an additional, beneficial reason to classify fentanyl,” the letter reads. “Given fentanyl’s lethality, low cost, and abundant availability, waiting for some state or non-state actor to utilize it as weapon before it is classified as such seems to be the same type of reasoning that kept the government from investigating foreign nationals learning to fly, but not land planes in the lead up to September 11th.”

On Tuesday, Skrmetti was back on the partisan front lines, this time protecting gun owners from credit card companies. 

Skrmetti and 24 other AGs warned American Express, Mastercard, and Visa that their creation of a merchant category code for firearms “is potentially a violation of consumer protection and antitrust laws.”

“Giant financial companies must not use their combined market power to circumvent our representative democracy,” Skrmetti said in a news release. “As Attorney General, I protect the people of Tennessee from corporate collusion that threatens to undermine their constitutional rights. Working together with my colleagues from other states, we will marshal the full scope of our lawful authority to stop this abuse.”

Skrmetti spent a lot of time in Memphis. He was a federal prosecutor in the Civil Rights Division and then served as Assistant U.S. Attorney here. He was a partner at Butler Snow in Memphis. He then went to work as Chief Deputy Attorney General and as chief counsel to Tennessee Governor Bill Lee. 

Skrmetti, his wife, and their four children now live in Franklin and attend Harpeth Hills Church of Christ, according to a news release from his office.  

Categories
News News Blog

State Settles with Walker Stalker Convention for Ticket Refunds

Makeup artist Greg Nicotero’s zombie effects are a recurring highlight of The Walking Dead.

Did you get stiffed on your Walker Stalker tickets? It may be time to get paid.

Tennessee Attorney General Herbert Slatery announced Wednesday a settlement with the fan convention’s owner that could yield refunds for ticket holders and vendors.

Walker Stalker LLC is the company behind dozens of conventions related to The Walking Dead television show and other shows. The Tennessee company and its owner, James Frazier, organized dozens of Walker Stalker Cons in the U.S. And the U.K.

In 2018, many of the events were canceled. Refunds were promised to ticket holders but they never materialized.

Other problems during the conventions also led many Walking Dead stars to begin to pull out of the Walker Stalker events. Khary Payton, who plays King Ezekial on the show, said on Twitter last year, “It’s time to shut this shit down.”

State Settles with Walker Stalker Convention for Ticket Refunds

Cooper Andrews, who plays Jerry on the show, said on Instagram last year that while he wants to meet fans, “Walker Stalker Fest is not he right place to do that.”

State Settles with Walker Stalker Convention for Ticket Refunds (3)

Convention owner Frazier stepped aside as the company’s CEO last year, acknowledging that the task was too great for him.

“It became too much and beyond my capabilities,” Frazier said in a Facebook post. “Today, I’m turning it over to new leadership and stepping down. I will no longer have any decisions in the direction of the company and its daily management. I will make sure that they are up to speed on each and every issue and make myself available to assist them in any way that would help them succeed.”
[pullquote-1-center] Slatery sued the company in February. In October, Frazier sold Walker Stalkers to 3fams Productions, a company that runs similar fan conventions. A portion of proceeds from future online Walker Stalker events will be used to reimburse consumers still owed refunds for canceled events, according to a recent 3fams press release.

The agreement announced Wednesday prevents Frazier from “engaging in the kind of conduct that led to the failure to provide promised ticket refunds for canceled events and obliges him to pay restitution owed to eligible consumers.”

Andrew Lincoln and Norman Reedus in The Walking Dead

“The Defendants now have to face a long list of people who have been waiting to be reimbursed for events that never happened,” said Slatery in a news release. “If you violate our state’s consumer protection laws, eventually you will have to pay.”

As part of the settlement, the state has arranged for an administrator, paid for by Frazier, to oversee a restitution website portal that will accept claims and refund eligible consumers.

If Frazier fails to fulfill the terms of the settlement, he has to pay a lump sum to the state to cover the costs of the administrator and consumer claims.

Categories
News News Blog

Groups File Lawsuit Challenging New State Law on Voter Registration


Three groups filed a federal lawsuit Thursday challenging a new Tennessee law that would put substantial requirements in place for groups that participate in voter registration efforts.

The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Tennessee, Campaign Legal Center, and Fair Elections Center on behalf of the League of Women Voters of Tennessee, the American Muslim Advisory Council, the Mid-South Peace and Justice Center, Rock the Vote, and Spread the Vote.

The defendants in the suit are Mark Goins, coordinator of elections for the state of Tennessee; Herbert Slatery, Tennessee Attorney General; and members of the state election commission.

The law in question, signed by Gov. Bill Lee last week, lists a slew of requirements for those participating in voter registration efforts and penalties for those who don’t comply.

[pullquote-1]

The legislation, HB 1079/ SB 971, sponsored by Rep. Tim Rudd (R-Murfreesboro)  and Sen. Ed Jackson (R-Jackson) includes conditions organizations must adhere to when holding voter registration drives.

Some of the requirements include providing the coordinator of elections with information about the drive prior to holding it, completing a training, and filing a sworn statement stating an intention to obey the laws and procedures pertaining to the process.

The law also creates civil and criminal penalties to groups or individuals who turn in more than 100 “deficient filings.”

The organizations who filed the lawsuit maintain that the law violates the freedoms of speech and association, due process, and the right to vote under the First and 14th Amendments.

“This is a lawsuit challenging strict, unnecessary, and irrational restrictions on community-based voter registration speech and activity,” the complaint reads. “Plaintiffs bring this action to prevent the enforcement of a new Tennessee law that unconstitutionally burdens and chills there core political speech and associational rights.”

The ACLU-TN said Thursday that Tennessee is ranked 44th in voter registration, but that there was a surge in registration during the 2018 midterm elections. The group believes the new law comes as a result of that registration growth and election officials’ lack of resources to handle the influx.

Sophia Lakin, staff attorney for the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project said the legislation is “punishing” civic organizations that advocate for people’s right to vote and that help them do so.

“With its dismal voter registration rates, Tennessee needs these groups on the ground,” Lakin said. “What politicians should be doing is making sure that local election officials have the adequate resources to do their jobs. Silencing civic groups’ voices is not the solution.”

Paul Garner, organizing director of the Mid-South Peace and Justice Center, one of the plaintiffs agreed, calling the law “draconian” and a form of voter suppression. Garner said the law punishes “those that want the democratic process to reflect and represent as many people as possible in communities like Memphis.”

[pullquote-2]

The lawsuit aims to ensure the political participation of all the state’s eligible voters, Hedy Weinberg, executive director of ACLU-TN said.

“Voter registration drives have long been a way for communities that are historically disenfranchises — including students, people of color, immigrants, and senior citizens — to empower individuals and gain access to the ballot box,” Weinberg said.

The League of Women Voters of Tennessee, another plaintiff, has prioritized making sure voters are properly registered and have all the information they need for nearly 100 years, according to Marian Ott, president of the organization.

“Voter registration surges like the one Tennessee saw in 2018 should be celebrated, not penalized,” Ott said. “We saw this law as a threat to democracy and a direct violation of our Constitution.”

The law created the “country’s most aggressive” penalties for voter registration drives, Paul Smith, vice president of the Campaign Legal Center, said.

“If the court does not intervene, the state will unlawfully chill the efforts of organizations working to get people registered,” Smith said. Voter registration drives for years have been a way for historically marginalized groups to empower their communities and gain access to the ballot box. We are taking Tennessee to court to protect that tradition against government threats of fines and jail time.”



Read the full complaint here

Categories
News News Blog

Several Memphis Family Dollar Stores Being Sold To DollarExpress

Family Dollar and Dollar Tree have merged, but because of concerns about lessening competition, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and 16 State Attorneys General (including the Attorney General for Tennessee) is requiring the discount chain to sell more than 300 Family Dollar stores across the country to a new competitor.

That new competitor is a chain called DollarExpress, and three Memphis Family Dollar stores will be included in that sale. The stores located at 1945 South Third, 6195 Winchester, and 2252 Lamar. One Nashville Family Dollar is being sold to DollarExpress, as well. Sycamore Partners, the parent company of DollarExpress, will be re-branding those stores after the sale.

“One of our concerns about the merger was that it would substantially lessen competition in markets like Nashville and Memphis,” said Tennessee Attorney General Herbert Slatery III. “By requiring stores to be sold to a new company in the marketplace, that competition to offer the best prices and merchandise will remain.”

The Tennessee Attorney General’s Office worked with the FTC in conducting a national review of the $9.2 billion acquisition. Other states joining Tennessee in the lawsuit included Alabama, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia.