Categories
Opinion

Mall Plan would give Raleigh “a fighting chance”

covermagnum.jpg

The Raleigh Springs Mall is in “deplorable” condition but would get a total makeover that would cost at least $36 million in public funds under a plan the city administration and Memphis City Councilman Bill Morrison are pushing.

Morrison, Mayor A C Wharton, Housing and Community Development Director Robert Lipscomb, and architect Tom Marshall presented the plan to about 225 people at The United Methodist church in Raleigh Thursday night. The crowd filled the sanctuary, which was a welcome sight to the church’s minister John Holt, who is used to seeing half that many people at Sunday services.

“There is hope,” Holt said of the latest plan, which has been revised several times in the last three and a half years. The racially mixed crowd applauded speakers several times, and leaders of the Raleigh Community Council, a longstanding neighborhood association, are enthusiastic. Morrison lives in Raleigh, and Marshall grew up there, giving the meeting something of a homecoming atmosphere.

The plan calls for partial demolition ($7 million) and phasing out existing businesses over the next few years, construction of a public library, police precinct and traffic station to replace existing ones ($23 million), and construction of a lake and a large fountain recognizing the history of Raleigh Springs ($6 million). It is hoped that this would attract private development, but no names of interested investors were mentioned at the meeting. A story Friday in The Commercial Appeal put the total price at $60 million including private investment, but that number did not come up at the meeting.

“I was so glad they are not going to remodel the mall,” said Imogene Tisdale, president of the association.

Joy Jefferson, a Memphis police officer, Raleigh resident, and head of the neighborhood watch, said “we’re going to take Raleigh back, and Frayser.”

The mall is more than 40 years old and has lost its anchor retail tenants and movie theater. Marshall called its condition “deplorable” and said there are about 32 small businesses still operating. The owner of one of them, Averill Brittenum, who has operated a custom air-brushing shop for 19 years, was not pleased with some of what he heard.

“I was surprised at how the community was so in favor of it being destroyed,” he said. “I had an eerie foreboding of the destruction of my business. When they talked about Mom and Pop stores it makes me feel expendable. This is my livelihood.”

Morrison promised to fight for funding and said some of it is already in capital improvements budgets going out as far as 2018. “We deserve this,” he said. The plan, he said, “gives us a fighting chance to bring businesses and families back to Raleigh.”

The project, however, faces competition for funding from other big public projects in Midtown, Whitehaven, downtown and other council members’ districts. When the lake feature of the mall came up, there was an echo of the parking garage under construction in Overton Square. Marshall said the low areas on the mall site “might open the door to stormwater funding.” The Overton Square garage covers a stormwater retention pond.

Lipscomb mentioned several of the other public projects underway around the city, and said the administration’s strategy is to fund anchor developments and “connect the dots.”

“You cannot cut your way to prosperity,” he said. “Austerity does not equal prosperity.”

Working the crowd like a veteran politician, Lipscomb said “I am not a czar, I am a public servant. My problem is I can’t say no.”

I think I hung that one on him, and he might want to get a second opinion. When you tell people you’re going to give them lots of nice new things with tax money you influence they usually smile, applaud, and call you blessed. That’s politics.

Categories
Editorial Opinion

A Marshall Plan

Though Memphians at large have not yet had an opportunity to peruse the contents of the so-called Marshall Report commissioned by City Council chairman Tom Marshall and other city-government officials at the onset of the still-raging MLGW scandal, the chairman promises that its details will shortly be posted on the council’s Web site for all to see.

Meanwhile, Marshall took advantage of a speaking opportunity downtown at a Rotary Club meeting on Tuesday to offer not only a sneak preview of that report (one bottom line: utility president Joseph Lee should be ousted for specific transgressions) but a prospectus for revising the way city government is organized. As Marshall made clear on Tuesday, city government is badly in need of some restructuring.

“I believe that morality is standing very low,” Marshall said, by way of assessing the moment. He cited some of the issues: incidences of corruption that have resulted, he says, in “ongoing investigation” by various organs of law enforcement; confusion as to the roles that various officials should be playing; a vague sense of ethical obligations in city government; and a need for redistributing authority.

“We have no authority for policing ourselves,” Marshall said, reminding his audience of a recent vote to suspend or expel two council members after their indictment on corruption charges. That effort was thwarted when the two council members themselves were allowed to vote on the issue — a glaring impropriety for which no legal prohibition seemed to exist.

What is needed, in any case, is an “authority beyond ourselves,” an ethics review board, to be composed of retired judges or some other such impeccable and disinterested group of arbiters.

There needs to be a new “master plan,” the chairman said, to oversee zoning issues. Marshall recalled that after the Gray’s Creek plan for suburban expansion in the greater Cordova area was adopted in the mid-’90s, it was promptly overruled in four consecutive majority votes in cases before the council. A reconstructed master plan should require a two-thirds majority to revise or rescind such a covenant, Marshall said.

Another need was for a redefinition of lines of authority. These, the chairman concluded, were embarrassingly vague as spelled out in the current charter. Marshall noted that when members of the new city Charter Commission asked for guidance in the matter, “we couldn’t even tell them what the current charter said.”

Another recommended change involved altering the “strong mayor” formula that now governs important city issues. In particular, Marshall reminded his listeners of contractual problems both with MLGW and with the “garage-gate” aspect of FedExForum’s construction. Marshall’s proposed remedy? Reassigning all contractual authority from the mayor’s office, where it currently resides, to the City Council.

These are not necessarily the only changes that should be considered by the currently sitting Charter Commission, but they belong on that body’s agenda as matters to be considered. Chairman Marshall is to be commended for having thought through some of these problems in so specific a manner.