Categories
Film Features Film/TV

Lady Bird

There is no more pleasing indie success story than Greta Gerwig. Around the same time the Great Recession started drying up traditional indie funding sources, a new wave of hyper-realist filmmakers started showing up on the festival circuit. A journalist at South by Southwest coined the term “mumblecore” to describe these films, which featured casts of mostly young people, emphasized character with largely improvised dialog, and told stories that revolved around the comedy and drama of everyday life. One of the earliest, and still among the best of the genre, was Joe Swanberg’s Hannah Takes the Stairs, with Gerwig in the titular role. All of the actors are good, but Gerwig is magnetic as the aimless young woman trying to choose between lovers.

Like most actors in mumblecore, Gerwig was playing a version of herself — a young woman working on the fringes of the movie industry. For a while, she was typecast as different versions of Hannah, only in movies with actual budgets such as Noah Baumbach’s Frances Ha, which she also co-wrote. Gerwig has the makings of a movie star but the chops of a character actor, as she proved when she sank into the role of the Kennedy’s personal secretary Nancy Tuckerman in Jackie. Now, with Lady Bird, she proves equally adept as director.

Saoirse Ronan (left) and Laurie Metcalf star in Greta Gerwig’s Lady Bird.

Lady Bird is set in Gerwig’s hometown of Sacramento in 2002, when she was a senior in high school, making it perhaps one of the first works of millennial nostalgia. The period signifiers are as well chosen as they are funny. People talk about how 9/11 “changed everything” (it did). The cool kid at school refuses to get a cell phone, which he calls “tracking devices” (they are). In the opening shot, Christine “Lady Bird” McPherson (Saoirse Ronan) and her mother Marion (Laurie Metcalf) tear up while listening to an audiobook of The Grapes of Wrath on actual cassette tapes in the family’s cheap compact car. Lady Bird (who naturally nicknamed herself) goes to pop a new tape in, but her mother stops her. Can’t they just chat and not be entertained every second they’re together, she asks? In seconds, it’s obvious the answer is no — at least not without fighting.

The two are coming back from a college scouting trip, as it’s Lady Bird’s senior year. The rest of the film follows her progress (and regress) as she struggles to find herself and plot her future. This is familiar territory for Gerwig, and she benefits tremendously by putting Ronan in the lead role. Ronan absorbs some of Gerwig’s explosive energy, but she brings a stillness and sadness with her. Gerwig’s Frances Ha quickly bounced back from all of her setbacks, but when Ronan’s Lady Bird is rebuked by her drama club friend Julie (Beanie Feldstein) for ditching the production of The Tempest in favor of kissing up to her new rich bestie Jenna (Odeya Rush), it leaves a lasting mark.

Saoirse Ronan (left) and Beanie Feldstein star in Greta Gerwig’s directorial debut, Lady Bird.

Did I mention this is a comedy? Because, despite the depth of the character work, it is frequently very funny. The Tempest production is directed by the lacrosse coach, who got the job after the Catholic school’s usual drama teacher Father Leviatch (Stephen Henderson) takes a leave of absence for depression — and it goes about as well as you would expect. Lady Bird is a working-class kid in a private school full of affluent students, and the class tensions that creates are never far from the surface.

The real meat of the picture is the mother-daughter relationship. Just as Lady Bird is trying to plan for college, her father (Tracy Letts) loses his job in the post-9/11 economic downturn. Working double shifts and dealing with a feisty daughter and a depressed husband drives Marion to her limits. Gerwig deftly mines the family dynamics for laughs and emotion, sometimes in the same scene.

Like Pretty in Pink, the film climaxes at the prom. But while John Hughes’ film is a clear reference point, Lady Bird’s big night goes very differently, and in some ways more satisfyingly. Lady Bird doesn’t get a Hollywood ending like Molly Ringwald did. Nor does she fly off on a plane to her bright future, like Ione Skye in Say Anything. Instead, in an extended coda, we follow her to college, where she catches herself making the same mistakes she made in high school. It’s a risky choice that I disagreed with at first blush but now believe is central to Gerwig’s theme of wisdom hard won.

Categories
Film/TV Film/TV/Etc. Blog

The Lovers

Have you ever seen a movie and wondered what the filmmakers thought they were doing? I’m not talking about a candidate for the “How Did This Get Made?” podcast—I”m talking about a film that doesn’t have a discernible reason for being. That was my reaction to The Lovers.

Is it a comedy? Then it needs to be funnier. Is it a relationship drama? Then I need to actually care about the characters. Is it that elusive animal, the successful dramedy? Then it needs to be both funnier and more poignant. The Lovers fails all of those tests.

Deborah Winger and Tracy Letts demonstrate an activity more enjoyable than watching The Lovers.

You never get a second chance to make a good first impression, and The Lovers blows it from the very start. Sure, this happens, but rarely does it happen in two different ways at the same time. Within minutes of the opening credits rolling, I was already annoyed by the busy, tone-deaf score. Then, we meet our first character, Michael (Tracy Letts). He’s in bed with Lucy (Melora Waters), who is crying. Turns out, Lucy is not Michael’s wife—that would be Mary, played by the great Deborah Winger. The very first note for The Lovers in my film notebook is this: “Old guy flops on bed. Overwrought performance. Soundtrack is overbearing and awful.” And it doesn’t get better.

It’s generally a bad sign when I make a lot of notes during a movie. The Lovers takes up six pages in my notebook. To give you the full experience of sitting through The Lovers, here is a annotated selection of some of my in-the-moment reactions.

“Spinning its wheels from the beginning”

“Beaten over the head with the score.”

“This fucking soundtrack!”
(The score is done by a full classical ensemble with strings and horns. Where the pacing of the story is slow to the point of stasis, perhaps to make room for anticipated but non-existent laughs, the soundtrack is bubbly and busy. It gives the impression that composer Mandy Hoffman is desperately trying to fill voids.)

“Sexually bored people being boring and unsexy”

“Is this the least sexy film about sex ever made? Maybe Caligula”
(Mary has her own boyfriend, Robert, played by Aiden Gillen, aka Littlefinger from Game Of Thrones. Like Michael and Lucy, they have very boring sex. It’s not just that the sex scenes are unimaginatively filmed, which they are, but that the characters and actors alike seem to not be enjoying themselves, even though they’re risking their entire boring suburban existences to have this boring sex. Perhaps this is supposed to be funny. It’s not.)

“Sound mix is also bad.”

“Yep, just sitting in the waiting room reading magazines. That’s good cinema!”
(This is a literal description of what was happening on the screen for what seemed like a very long time.)

“These people are idiots, assholes, and not funny!”
(I don’t usually use this many exclamation points in my notes.)

“HOW MUCH LONGER CAN THIS GO ON?”
(The movie was less than half over.)

“Sooo…looong…bad….pacing…”

“Oh god I hate these people.”

On page four of my notes, I began aggressively doodling. I’m not much of a draughtsman, so my doodles tend to be grids, spirals, and easy geometric shapes, all of which were more interesting than The Lovers.

“Every scene goes on 50% too long.”

“Dialog is awful.”

“Cavalcade of bad directorial decisions”
(Winger is one of the greatest actresses of her generation. Letts is a Pulitzer Prize winning playwright with more than a dozen screen acting appearances. The fact that neither one of them turn in a decent performance lands the blame for this fiasco squarely on the shoulders of director Azazel Jacobs.)

“It’s like the same scene over and over again”

“All is folly and vanity”
(I was beginning to lose hope at this point.)

“Get these people therapy”

“Editing is horrible”

“What the hell kind of accent is Littlefinger peddling?”
(Gillen is from Ireland, but his character Robert is supposed to be a nebbishy, ineffectual American writer. For most of the film, he drifts in the void between accents. Then, in his big scene where he reveals his affair with Mary to Michael, he slips into his menacing Littlefinger voice. That was the only actual laugh this alleged comedy drew out of me.)

“LONG LONG SCENE OF DRYING DISHES”

“Can’t settle on a tone. Can’t blend comedy and drama”
(I know Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul make it look easy, but dramedy is hard.)

“Sometimes I really hate movies”