Categories
News News Blog

Advisory Group to Consider MLGW Switch from TVA

A Memphis Light, Gas, and Water (MLGW) official said Tuesday that the utility is forming an advisory committee to weigh the option of alternative power sources.

Switching from the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) to another power source has been a recurring topic for the Memphis City Council and MLGW officials over the past several months.

J.T. Young, president of the utility, told the council MLGW committee Tuesday that he’s been working with Memphis Mayor Jim Strickland to form a committee who will consider power sources other than TVA. Young said the process will be “rigorous” and could take months to complete.

The group will be comprised of business leaders, community members, and officials, who,  Young said, haven’t been finalized yet. He anticipates introducing those members to the council in two weeks.

At the same, MLGW is working on an integrated resource plan, which will outline the utility’s resource needs in order to meet electricity needs over a set period of time.

Young said that plan, along with input from the community and advisory team, will be taken into account when deciding whether to sever its agreement with TVA.

If the utility were to move away from TVA, it would have to give a five-year notice. Young said there are many other considerations that have to be taken into account if MLGW were to end the agreement that “go well beyond what the studies have shown.”

Ultimately, Young said the decision to switch power sources will be made by MLGW’s board and the city council.

A February study showed that MLGW could save between $240 million and $333 million each year if it were to switch from TVA.

Ordered by the environmental advocacy group, Friends of the Earth, the study suggested that Memphis could build its own energy systems or buy it from another supplier like Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO), the nonprofit energy group supplying energy for parts of 15 states like Louisiana, Arkansas, and Mississippi.


Categories
News News Blog

TVA Plans to Remove Coal Ash from Allen Site

Southern Environmental Law Center

Aerial shots of TVA’s Memphis power plants.

UPDATE:

Shortly after TVA announced on Wednesday that it would remove coal ash from ponds at the Allen Fossil Plant, state Senator Brian Kelsey announced he’d filed a resolution calling for the removal of coal ash from ponds at the Allen Fossil Plant.

“Clean water is one of our most precious resources in West Tennessee,” said Senator Kelsey. “We should be doing everything we can to ensure that it remains safe and clean for future generations.

“Action must be taken to ensure that arsenic and other toxic compounds found in the coal ash landfill sites are not leaking into our water supply. It is essential that the coal ash containment ponds at the plant be emptied and closed as quickly as possible in the interest of public health.”

Senate Joint Resolution 29 asks the TVA to take action to ensure Memphis water is protected from a potential breach.

ORIGINAL POST:

The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) plans to remove the coal ash from its now-idled Allen Fossil Plant in Memphis.

TVA now has two coal ash ponds at the Allen plant and some coal ash around what TVA calls the metal cleaning pond. Coal ash is left behind after coal was burned to fuel the plant and make electricity. That ash, however, is toxic and arsenic and other chemicals have leaked into groundwater under the coal ash ponds at Allen.

TVA closed the ponds after it stopped using the fossil plant, switching to new plant that uses natural gas to make electricity. But the agency considered sealing the ponds and storing the ash in place. But TVA announced Wednesday that option is off the table.

Instead, TVA will consider options that remove the ash. They are now deciding where the ash will go.

One option has TVA building and using a “a proposed beneficial re-use facility to process (coal ash) materials. The other would move the ash in “to an offsite landfill location.”

Southern Environmental Law Center

Aerial shots of TVA’s Memphis power plants.

Removing the ash, too, could make the “closure area land available for future economic development projects in the greater Memphis area,” according to a statement from TVA’s website.

“Bottom line is TVA does not own this property, and we think this is the best option for the future economic development options,” TVA spokesman Scott Brooks said in a statement.

Members of the local branch of the Sierra Club and the Protect Our Aquifer (POA) groups said the decision to remove the ash was a step in the right direction.

“Closure-in-place was never an option in mind, not in anybody’s mind,” said Ward Archer, president of POA. “That’s the equivalent of doing nothing, basically. It can’t be done. We all know there’s no protective clay layer below (the coal ash ponds). They have got to get (the coal ash) out of there.

Scott Banbury, the Sierra Club’s Tennessee chapter conservation programs coordinator, said the move was “great news.”

“We knew already their preferred option was to dig the (coal ash) up and move it somewhere else,” Banbury said. “It’s nice that they are saying that publicly.”

Categories
News News Blog

Cohen: TVA Coal Ash Clean-Up Timeline ‘Unacceptable’

USGS

Groundwater discharge from an aquifer test at the Tennessee Valley Authority Allen Combined Cycle Plant in October.

Tennessee Valley Authority’s (TVA) clean up of the coal ash at its now-idled Allen Fossil Plant could take up to 20 years and Rep. Steve Cohen told TVA leaders Tuesday that’s too long.

TVA said it will close its remaining coal ash pond at the Allen plant. The federal agency is now in the process of deciding just how it will deal with the coal ash that remains at the site. Options include sealing the ash and storing it in place and removing the ash.

Cohen wrote a letter to TVA’s “outgoing and incoming presidents and CEOs” on Tuesday after a meeting with the Tennessee congressional delegation. In the letter, Cohen said “they are not treating the cleanup of the coal ash found in the groundwater at the Allen Fossil Plant in Memphis with sufficient urgency.”

[pdf-1]

“While it was my understanding that corrective work will begin this year, I was alarmed to learn at the meeting that cleanup could take as long as 20 years,” Cohen said. “TVA’s timeline to address its coal ash – the primary source of pollution at Allen – is unacceptable. The citizens of Memphis and Shelby County deserve nothing less than full commitment in this matter.”

According to a brief news release issued by Memphis City Council chairman Kemp Conrad Tuesday morning, members of the council and leaders with Memphis Light, Gas & Water were in Chattanooga Tuesday to meet with TVA leaders. 

Categories
News News Blog

County Health Department Limits TVA’s Use of Aquifer Wells

USGS

Groundwater discharge from an aquifer test at the Tennessee Valley Authority Allen Combined Cycle Plant in October.


The Shelby County Health Department placed rules on how the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) uses five wells at its Allen natural gas plant this week.

The health department prohibited TVA from using the wells, which the utility previously committed to not using, except in three circumstances:

Sampling for contaminants or studying the connection of the shallow and deep aquifers. Approval for the studies must be granted by the Tennessee Department of Conservation.


Using the plant for water in an emergency when Memphis Light, Gas & Water cannot provide it. This is to be done only to avoid “serious damage or disruption to the regional power grid.”

Limited Maintenance of up to 30 minutes each quarter.


These modified permits are in response to a December request to limit or prohibit TVA’s use of the wells by the Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC) on behalf of Protect Our Aquifer and the Sierra Club in order to avoid contamination of Memphis’ drinking water source.

The health department previously gave TVA permits to drill five wells into the Memphis Sand Aquifer in order to pump about 3.5 million gallons of water to cool its energy plant here.

After tests found high levels of arsenic and lead at the site, TVA said it would not use the wells until after a state investigation into groundwater contamination is completed.

A coal ash pond at TVA’s Allen Fossil Plant.

The five wells in question are housed in the Allen Combined Cycle Plant, which sits within a half-mile of a leaking coal ash pond operated by TVA. The ash pond is the center of ongoing state and federal investigations into groundwater contaminants, including arsenic and lead. Studies have suggested that use of the wells could put the Memphis Sand Aquifer at greater risk of contamination from the coal ash pond.

Research done by the University of Memphis and the U.S. Geological Survey last year showed that the coal ash pond is connected to the Memphis Sand Aquifer through gaps in the aquifer’s protective clay layers. The study also found that this connection could cause the contaminated groundwater to be pulled into the drinking water source when water is pumped from the wells.

Amanda Garcia, the senior attorney for SELC, said TVA should have never asked for the permits to use the wells, and that “we’re pleased to see that the county acknowledged, in a letter, that TVA would be denied permits to drill the wells if they had applied today.”

She added that the rules placed on utility’s usage demonstrates “how serious the pollution risk is to the county’s drinking water source.”

Ward Archer, president of Protect Our Aquifer, agreed, saying the county made the right decision in placing restrictions on TVA’s well use.

“Last year, the Shelby County Groundwater Control Board made the first step to better protect the Memphis Sand Aquifer by adopting stronger rules for obtaining permits and operating wells that pull from the Memphis Sand.

“However, we still need better local groundwater protections across the area and we hope Shelby County continues to work to conserve our most precious natural resource.”

Categories
News News Blog

Study: Switch From TVA Power Could Save Up To $333M

TVA

TVA’s new Combined Cycle Plant.

Memphis Light, Gas & Water could save $240 million to $333 million each year by switching away from the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) for electricity, according to a new report issued Monday.

Friends of the Earth, an environmental advocacy group, ordered a study of the switch from the Brattle Group, an “energy, economic, and financial research group that advises major energy providers, utilities, and governments around the country and across the globe.”

The study is called “Power to Memphis – Options for a Reliable, Affordable, and Greener Future.” It contends that if MLGW and the city of Memphis terminated its contract with TVA and develop an alternative energy supply, the savings each year could reach to $333 million per year.

The options in the study do not include the proposal to use an abandoned TVA nuclear power plant in Alabama for Memphis energy.

“We could have reliable, cheaper, cleaner power for customers across Memphis,” Herman Morris, former MLGW president, said in a statement. “Memphis has the power to become a showcase for 21st century energy that will cost less and stop polluting the air and water. We should be looking ahead and not backward to TVA’s expensive and dirty nuclear reactors and coal-fired power plants.”

If MLGW signed letters today to end its contract with TVA, MLGW would still have to buy power from TVA for five years. In that time, Memphis could build its own energy systems or buy it for another supplier like Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO), the nonprofit energy group supplying energy for parts of 15 states like Louisiana, Arkansas, and Mississippi.

MLGW

A solar panel array at Agricenter International.

All of the options studied would create fewer emissions than those with TVA’s current power supply, according to the study, and some scenarios saw all of Memphis’ power coming from renewable sources as early as 2050.

“MLGW customers deserve to know their options for cheaper bills and cleaner energy,” said former TVA chairman David Freeman. “City officials and MLGW officials need to begin the conversation now so the required five-year TVA notice process can begin sooner rather than later.”

TVA officials did not immediately respond to an invitation to comment on the study. We’ll update this story if they do. 

Categories
Fly On The Wall Blog Opinion

Information Control: Why TVA Ratepayers May Pay For Coal Ash Fallout

Reporters sometimes do reckless things to bring home a story. By the time I got to Kingston, TN, in January, 2009, 24-hour police barricades blocked all apparent access to TVA’s catastrophic pond breach — a massive coal ash spill NBC nightly news had  described as an environmental disaster 30-times larger than the Exxon Valdez oil spill. National news organizations and environmentalists had gotten in early before safety concerns and concerns about TVA’s reputation turned the area into a forbidden zone, off limits to everybody, especially media. Of course, roadblocks are a mere speed bump for reporters armed with scribbled directions on the back of a bar napkin. Team Flyer would make it back to Memphis with photos of the “ash-bergs,” as the enormous toxic sludge formations were being called, even if it meant playing a little Smokey and the Bandit.

I’m reminded of the scene in Kingston by Gannett’s sobering report highlighting extraordinary information quietly buried in a TVA earnings report. The utility is finally admitting that ratepayers may soon be on the hook for legal settlements against Jacobs Engineering, a contractor working for TVA that has admitted under oath to misleading 900 employees about the  risks of coal ash exposure. This news follows 40 deaths and more than 400 reported ailments ranging from respiratory problems and rashes to heart disorders, neurological disorders and cancer.

Via Gannett:

A jury in U.S. District Court in November ruled Jacobs violated its contract with TVA for the cleanup work and endangered workers as a result. That trial revealed TVA ratepayers had paid Jacobs $60 million for that contract work.

I’m not posting today to revisit past adventures in journalism or to advance Gannett’s top notch summation of what’s transpired over the past decade. In keeping with a recent theme on this blog, I’d rather look back to the weeks immediately following the disaster. Knowing what we know now, I’d like to look at this in terms of access and transparency and think about what happens when there’s a disaster and information is treated like a private concern rather than a public good.  

If you have the time, I recommend taking a look at “Shades of Gray,” my vintage coverage of the Kingston disaster, published as a Memphis Flyer cover story shortly after the event. I think it makes a good companion to Gannett’s latest revelation and retrospective. Like the sub-head says, confusion reigned in the early days following the spill. It was driven, in part, by a concerted effort on behalf of TVA and coal-related interests to make sure the citizens of Kingston and Roane Co. had the absolute best possible information for TVA and coal-related interests.

Via me, 2009:

A nattily dressed man with snow-white hair waited patiently, then, when he got his turn at the microphone, erupted like a volcano: “Who can I trust? Tell me, who can I trust?” he asked, his voice quivering.

The man ran down a list cataloging the incongruous viewpoints he’d been subjected to for 18 days — the time that had passed since the waste-retaining wall at the TVA’s Kingston Fossil Plant gave way, and his hometown — once a water-lover’s paradise tucked into the postcard-perfect hills of East Tennessee — became the new synonym for environmental disaster. 

“Tell me who I should trust,” he pleaded, obviously doubtful that [famous organizer Erin] Brockovich or the panel of scientists — and legal consultants from New York’s Weitz & Luxenberg law firm — assembled in the gymnasium at Roane State Community College were less self-interested than the environmentalists, media, or coal-industry spokesmen, all of whom seemed to offer conflicting answers.

“‘Who can I trust?’ was the most prescient question anybody asked,”  Owen Hoffman, the president of SENES Risk Management in Oak Ridge, told The Flyer in an interview following his appearance on Brockovich’s panel. In a conversation ranging from hard science to the social dynamics at play in Kingston, he described environmentalists as being so accustomed to thankless uphill struggles, they can always be counted on to accentuate negatives while acknowledging that industry spokespeople and real-estate developers “trivialize” realistic consequences to protect financial interests.

“The ties between government and industry have been too close for many years, so it’s not unreasonable to wonder if the information we get from our government agencies is reliable,” Hoffman said.

Private industry was a notable player in the Kingston response. And while some residents were thankful for Brockovich’s contravening presence, others expressed worry about “out of town interlopers” and “sharks.” There was a lot of good reporting around the Kingston disaster, but when distinctive sides present themselves, media narratives tend to favor the controversy over the concern. That was not always the case here, but was generally as the big question became, “is this sludge REALLY ALL THAT toxic?” instead of “what’s the best way to get people the relief and recompense they deserve while managing this toxic sludge?” 

“I think the public has been very poorly informed,”

 one toxicologist said to the crowd at a food-and-drink-heavy event sponsored by the American Coal Ash Association (ACAA). “It’s wrong to characterize the ash as toxic sludge. That’s a pejorative term,” he said. “It’s like my wife complaining that she had to drink toxic sludge because she recently had a gastrointestinal exam and the doctor made her swallow barium.”

Via me, 2009:

On the night before Brockovich’s town hall-style meeting, another group of scientists held a different kind of gathering at Kingston’s Midtown Elementary School. Consultants from the American Coal Ash Association (ACAA) hosted a meet-and-greet event that included a massive buffet table weighted down with shrimp, meatballs, croissants stuffed with chicken salad, fruit, pastry, cookies, and a selection of exotic cheeses.

There was no official presentation, but Kingston residents could walk around and ask questions of the ACAA’s scientists…

There was also a medical doctor on hand to address — and minimize — concerns about long-term health risks and a coal-ash expert who explained how using fly ash in concrete helps mitigate the greenhouse gasses released in the coal-burning process.

“I don’t think anybody’s going to see Blinky the three-eyed fish in the river,” said Dr. Michael Bollenbacher, a radiation expert and the one showman among the ACAA’s consultants. He took on tough questions from Harriman resident John Hoage, a retired attorney who has sued tobacco companies.

Bollenbacher’s reference to Blinky was likely a response to the opening paragraphs of a 2007 article in Scientific American called “Coal Ash Is More Radioactive than Nuclear Waste” that had been making its way into e-mails all over Kingston.

Bollenbacher worked the crowd like a blackjack dealer, running a pair of Geiger counters over bags of local dirt and coal ash, as well as over typical household objects. The dirt and coal ash triggered little response from the machines, while the household objects made them screech…

“Did you hear what happened when I held it over the plate?” he asked, as if the red Fiestaware on the table was typical of contemporary kitchenware. But red Fiestaware, which hasn’t been produced for decades, is somewhat infamous for containing uranium and lead that can be leeched out by acidic foods such as tomato sauce.

“But what do I know about any of this?” Bollenbacher asked rhetorically. “I’m just a dumb scientist, an independent consultant who doesn’t have a dog in this fight.”

It’s only as radioactive as this plate.

Let’s generously presume that the ACAA’s indie consultant didn’t know the plate he used to represent an ordinary household object was infamous for tickling Geiger counters. And maybe nobody assembled at the coal-friendly event had a “dog in the fight.” But 10 years, and many deaths and illnesses later, it looks like coal ash loose in the environment might be at least a little more hazardous than dinner service. 

John Hoage, a retired attorney who attended the coal-friendly eat-and-greet, wasn’t having it. Hoage, who had sued tobacco companies in the past, pulled out a folder of information he’d collected about the ACAA. He said the organization’s membership page reads like a “Who’s Who” of coal industry heavyweights. He said he didn’t think anybody was telling him the whole truth.

“All of this reminds me of the 1950s,” Hoag said. “The tobacco industry had scientists, too, and they used similar arguments to minimize the risks of cigarette smoke.”

Hoag was particularly interested in cases related to prolonged exposure to smoke — like flight attendants trapped in smoke-filled cabins. He thought this was a more apt comparison to the situation in Kingston, than odd shots of barium related to occasional medical procedures. 

Information Control: Why TVA Ratepayers May Pay For Coal Ash Fallout (2)

Now here’s the real question: Why was there a controversy for media to report and residents/consumers to contend with in the first place? While it might be entirely true that coal ash, an ingredient in various modern building materials, can be essentially harmless when it’s stabilized by containment, that information, no matter how accurate, isn’t useful to anybody when vast quantities are dumped into the environment. To get to the bottom of things The Flyer found a scientist named Bryce Payne with a 15-year history of working on unrelated coal ash piles. He essentially affirmed the ACAA’s most optimistic claims, but that wasn’t anywhere near the end of Payne’s informed assessment.


If the ash is released from the pond and exposed to substantially different environmental conditions, as happened in Kingston, however, Payne thinks there is then a substantial chance that the previously stable elements will become unstable. If that occurs there could be a net release of the toxins “that will accumulate to potentially threatening levels.”

 Also:

“Among humans, the tolerance for exposure to toxic elements can vary widely,” he explained. “Some can tolerate high exposures, some only very limited exposures. The same is true among plants and animals. Carp are a rough fish species, tolerant of pretty poor water quality. Other fish species cannot tolerate conditions that carp thrive in.”

Payne was extremely reluctant to be interviewed at the time because, in his opinion, the  news media does a terrible job reporting on science. He worried about sensational treatment and that his comments would be decontextualized to support pro-environmentalist positions he wasn’t endorsing. As Memphis fans of Dr. Heckle’s science news podcast already know, bad science reporting is a legitimate concern. I think I did okay by him though, and four months later he’s quoted in The Nation expressing even grimmer concerns about the state and federally backed cleanup project:

Despite warnings that the dredging may trigger a major toxic event, the TVA, backed by federal and state officials, is following through with its plans. “There apparently has been horrendous pressure to dredge at any costs,” said Bryce Payne, an independent environmental consultant who has been working on fly ash for more than fifteen years. “But the fish and similarly vulnerable biota in the Emory and Clinch River system simply will not be able to tolerate additional selenium.”

More from The Nation May, 2009:

Payne, who has offered his consulting services to the TVA and state regulators, wants officials to understand why so many of the best-laid plans could be heading toward disaster. In the March 20 e-mail to Sloan, he questioned the TDEC’s assumptions, pressed the agency to make its selenium data public and criticized Tennessee’s water-quality standards as too permissive regarding selenium. He zeroed in on the state agency’s pledge to follow up on fish tissue studies. The problem with fish tissue tests, he explained, is that selenium “bioaccumulates,” inching its way into fish and animals over months and years, not days and weeks. If you find selenium in high concentrations in fish tissue, the theory goes, you’re already in trouble. “[Fish tissue data] will not tell you how much more selenium may still come after you have finally detected that a threatening amount was there in the first place,” he told Sloan. In a telephone interview, Payne said that the threat was hard to detect: “Selenium, by its nature and chemistry, will sneak up on us,” Payne says. “It’s like the frog in the pot of slowly heating water.”

Among scientific experts, Payne is far from alone. “The folks in charge feel they don’t have the luxury to consider other ways to clean the river out,” said Joseph Skorupa, a biologist and selenium expert with the US Fish and Wildlife Service. “But they should understand that letting loose selenium is a momentous decision.”

So why did it take 10 years, possibly 40 deaths, and more than 400 illnesses to get a quiet admission in an earnings report that ratepayers might be on the hook for liabilities resulting from TVA’s bad stewardship at the edge of real darkness? There are lots of reasons, obviously, but I’m going to let TVA and politicians off the hook momentarily and answer in words I’ve typed too often lately — words readers will probably grow tired of seeing as I write more media and information-related posts over the next several months: Markets determine news content.

Let’s face it, producers can only squeeze so much reality appeal from the chemistry of  Selenium, an element that, according to studies cited by the EPA,  may result in things like “discoloration of the skin, loss of nails and hair, excessive tooth decay, listlessness, lack of mental alertness etc.” According to The Nation the agency “also labels selenium sulfide, a selenium compound, a ‘probable human carcinogen’”  But that’s not my point. Responsible science reporting doesn’t make for gripping, accessible prose or TV news content attractive to the most broadly attractive consumers (to advertisers) who, according to the best sources I know on the topic, don’t give a flip about public affairs reporting. Still, many commercial newsrooms thought this story worth investing in. The Flyer, a small, typically hyperlocal newsweekly from the other side of the state, thought the incident was valuable enough to send a reporter when it happened. Regional news teams followed the story year after year and the incident only received sporadic statewide or national notice. But if the Kingston spill was 30-times larger than the Exxon Valdes disaster, it wasn’t half as hyped.

Information Control: Why TVA Ratepayers May Pay For Coal Ash Fallout

Gannett’s latest summation, as reported in its various Tennessee papers including The Commercial Appeal, accomplishes everything good newspaper reporting is supposed to do, covering and contextualizing a lot of complicated ground. But from the onset, Kingston’s narrative turned on controversy rather than urgent common cause. As is often the case with shocking events, when it stopped being breaking national news, it was never again amplified or sustained by social or legacy media long enough to force scrutiny, build mass-trust or foment opinion in the face of considerable public relations efforts by coal-related interests including, by TVA’s own self-congratulatory account,100-million in dollar diplomacy investments “that improved or enhanced Roane Co.” Not to mention that generous seafood-laden buffet I once covered. I can’t deny, those fat shrimp assured and delighted my disaster-deprived tummy all those years ago.

WBIR’s Dec., 2018 retrospective noted that TVA had given $32-million to area schools after the disaster — more dollar diplomacy. The report stated that the $1.2-billion cost of cleanup was spread out over 15 years, at no additional cost to ratepayers. 

There’s a lot of blame to go around, but the worst of everything that happened in Kingston was amplified by people not knowing who to trust or to turn to for help finding good information. The death, discomfort, displacement, and personal loss is an indictment of private, state, and federal priorities. But it also represents the failures of an information industry that may never find an economic platform for sustained and meaningful public affairs reporting in the modern age. Absent that, there will always be too many deterrents, distractions and roadblocks preventing consumers from accessing the information they need and never enough barricade-evading directions scribbled on the back of bar napkins. 

Yes, we dumped a bunch of coal ash in your backyard, but aren’t you hungry?

    

Erin Brockovich in Kingston

  

Categories
News News Blog

Former TVA and MLGW Heads Criticize Nuclear Power Proposal

TVA

Bellefonte nuclear plant

The former chairman for the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) joined former Memphis Light, Gas, and Water (MLGW) president in speaking out against a proposal for Memphis to switch to a nuclear power source.

Dave Freeman, former TVA head, and Herman Morris Jr., former MLGW leader, sent a letter dated November 19th to the Memphis City Council and Memphis Mayor Jim Strickland, urging them not to support the proposal for MLGW to switch from TVA to the Alabama-based nuclear plant, Bellefonte.

A representative from the group Nuclear Development LLC told the council last month that the switch could save Memphis $500 million a year.

“We write to express our grave concern that the city of Memphis is considering the purchase of electricity from the unfinished Bellefonte nuclear power reactors,” the letter reads. “This plant is so outdated that even TVA couldn’t complete them after a half of century of trying.”

The letter continues, urging the mayor and council to heed the advice of current MLGW president J.T. Young, who told the council he was skeptical about the proposal at its October 9th meeting.

One of Young’s concerns was whether or not Nuclear Development would be able to complete the construction of the plant.

The pair said that the plant’s two unfinished reactors, which were first designed in the 1960s are “woefully out-of-date.”

Even if construction of the reactors is completed, Morris and Freeman argue that the cost to maintain the plant would be “enormous,” meaning the price of power would be more expensive than from TVA or from other “clean, safe, renewable resources like solar and wind power.”

“This fact is why old nuclear power plants around the country are closing,” the letter reads. “They simply cannot compete against safer, cleaner, and better 21st century energy technologies.”

Additionally, the letter cites that Memphis is TVA’s largest customer, and that Bellefonte could not provide power to all of the city, as it is “too small to meet all our needs.”

“At best, Bellefonte could provide only a fraction of the power supply that Memphis would need,” while the rest would have to come from other sources outside of Nuclear Development’s ownership.

The duo urged the council to await the December release of MLGW’s study on long-term power supply options

“We therefore urge you to say ‘NO!’ to an attempt by Nuclear Development LLC to mislead Memphians with unsupported claims of cost savings in order for it to obtain a handout from the federal government.”


Categories
News News Blog

Proposal to Use Alabama Plant for Power Raises Concern

Facebook

Scott Banbury of Sierra Club Tennessee

A well-known Memphis environmental activist is leery of a proposal for Memphis to buy its power from a currently incomplete Alabama-based nuclear plant.

The proposal for Memphis to switch from the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) to the Bellefonte nuclear plant in Hollywood, Alabama, was presented to a Memphis City Council committee on Tuesday by former COO for TVA Bill McCollum, who is now with the group Nuclear Development LLC. McCollum said that the switch could save Memphis $487 million annually.

Currently, Memphis Light, Gas and Water (MLGW) pays TVA $1 billion a year for electricity. Urging the council not to approve MLGW rate increases, McCollum told the council that “there is a better way to improve infrastructure and help the citizens of Memphis rather than just raising the utility rates and saddling customers with higher bills.”

But, Scott Banbury, the conservation programs coordinator for the Tennessee chapter of the Sierra Club, is skeptical of the proposal. He called it a “financing scheme,” in an email to the Flyer, saying that Nuclear Development is a “self-interested investor.”

[pullquote-1]

“Nuclear Development, LLC has been disingenuous, at best, suggesting that they could lower MLGW ratepayers’ fees by one half,” Banbury wrote. “Nuclear Development, LLC has no real idea of what their final costs will be, and as evidenced by recent experiences in Georgia and South Carolina, the costs and subsequent rates would eventually be much higher.”

TVA

Bellefonte nuclear plant


Of the study MLGW president J.T. Young said the utility is conducting on infrastructure needs and energy options for the future, Banbury said he hopes MLGW is looking at “clean, renewable energy sources like solar and wind power to meet our future demands.”

“MLGW CEO J.T. Young is appropriately cautious about wedding Memphis to Nuclear Development’s pie-in-the-sky pursuit of new nuclear power plants when other such ventures are failing all around us,” Banbury said. “Sierra Club is glad that MLGW is pursuing the study of alternate energy providers.”

Banbury suggests that MLGW invest in renewable energy options, which would “significantly reduce costs to MLGW ratepayers and unburden Memphis from financial responsibility for TVA’s bad choices in the past.”

The “bad choices,” Banbury said, result in unlined toxic coal ash ponds along rivers throughout the state. He adds that one of those ponds is here in Memphis and is leaking arsenic, lead, and flouride into the groundwater.

Banbury also said that MLGW should break its contract with TVA that bars the utility from making direct investments in local solar generation, contracting windpower from the midwest, and developing substantial energy efficiency.

“Memphis needs to embrace a broad based supply of clean energy — solar, wind, and efficiency — and not be locked into sole reliance on dirty fossil fuels or nuclear energy,” Banbury said. “Sierra Club says yes to breaking with TVA’s 100 percent requirements, yes to embracing renewable energy, and no to nuclear energy.”

Categories
Cover Feature News

The Water City

Water defines Memphis.

Without the Mississippi River, the city would not exist at all. Its bones are formed as Nonconnah Creek and the Wolf River shape the I-240 loop. The massive Memphis Sand Aquifer below the city promises a future when so many communities face historic uncertainty.

“We are a water city,” said Joe Royer, who owns Outdoors, Inc. and can frequently be seen paddling kayaks up and down the Mississippi River. “When it snows in Yellowstone [National Park], it flows by Tom Lee Park. When you’re watching Monday Night Football and it’s sleeting in Pittsburgh, it’ll come through Memphis.”

But much of the city’s waters face threats, old and new. And a cadre of locals is organizing to fight them.

The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) awaits testing results before it can pump 3.5 million gallons of Memphis water per day from the Memphis Sand Aquifer, the source of the city’s drinking water, to cool its new energy plant on President’s Island.

Citizens north of Memphis await word from state agencies to see if a site near their homes will host a pipeline that will dump 3.5 million gallons of wastewater every day into the Mississippi River.

And city officials in Memphis continue, under a federal mandate, to fix a broken wastewater system that has dumped hundreds of millions of gallons of raw sewage into local waterways.

TVA and the Memphis Sand Aquifer

Raise the 57 trillion gallons of water from the Memphis Sand Aquifer to the surface, and it would flood all of Shelby County to the top of Clark Tower. This fact arises in almost every discussion of whether or not TVA should use Memphis drinking water to cool its new, natural-gas-fed Allen Combined Cycle Plant.

It’s a lot of water, which scores a point for TVA in discussions. And TVA’s proposed water draw wouldn’t be the biggest. (A local DuPont chemical plant sucks up 15 million gallons of aquifer water every day, according to local water experts.) But it’s not just any water.

Called “the sweetest in the world,” Memphis drinking water begins as rain in Fayette County and filters through acres of sand as it glugs slowly westward to Memphis. How slowly? The aquifer water under downtown Memphis fell from the sky about 2,000 to 3,000 years ago, according to Brian Waldron, director of the Center for Applied Earth Science and Engineering Research (CAESER) in the Herff College of Engineering at the University of Memphis. So, that water got its start very roughly between the time Homer wrote the Illiad and the Odyssey and the birth of Jesus of Nazareth.

That fact scores a point for local environmentalists who say the resource is rare, maybe priceless.

“It can be argued that 3.5 [million gallons of water per day] is a drop in the bucket, but we must never forget that our resource is finite and that individually we can be good stewards of our groundwater,” Waldron wrote in an opinion piece for The Commercial Appeal.

Volume, though, has rarely been the main bone of contention in the many arguments that have roiled the aquifer debate since it really got started in 2016. Environmental groups and others are more worried that the TVA’s five 650-foot wells could draw toxins into all that “sweet” water.

That argument gained new ground this summer when TVA discovered arsenic levels in some wells around the energy plant were more than 300 times higher than federal drinking water standards. Lead and fluoride levels there were also higher than federal safety standards. The contaminated water sits under a pond that stores coal ash, the remnants of the coal TVA now burns for power at the Allen Fossil Plant. That pond is a quarter mile from those five wells drilled into the Memphis Sand Aquifer.

“We believe our public drinking water is our most valuable asset,” Ward Archer, founder of Protect Our Aquifer (POA), said during a water policy meeting last month. “If you really, really, really, think about it — and especially going forward — [water is] everything, and we have it in spades. But we have a lot of contamination threats.”

Archer formed POA mainly as a Facebook group in 2016 to spread the word about TVA’s plans to tap the aquifer. He formally registered the group later so it could have legal standing to join a lawsuit with the local arm of the Sierra Club to stop TVA’s well permits last year.

Scott Banbury, the Sierra Club’s Tennessee Conservation Programs Coordinator, said his core argument against the TVA wells gets down to money versus people.

“[Memphis-area customers] send $1 billion a year to TVA for our power,” Banbury said. “For them to not use wells that might compromise our drinking water would only cost $6 million. There are 9 million people in TVA-land that are required by federal law to pay the price for anything that TVA does.

“How does that math add up?” he continues. “I think it comes out to about 65 cents per year per person to make sure that we’re not messing up Memphis’ water. Sixty-five cents per person per year and you can do the right thing, the good thing.”

But TVA is required by the TVA Act (the federal law that created the organization) to provide power “at the lowest feasible price for all consumers in the Tennessee Valley,” according to an excerpt from an August TVA document called “Key Messages.”

TVA officials said in the document that its original plan (to use wastewater to cool the plant) would have required it to clean the water, adding an additional $9 million to $23 million annual cost to customers. They also looked to use water from McKellar Lake and the Mississippi Alluvial Aquifer. But all of these options, TVA said, would have added costs and risked the reliability of the new plant.

“TVA is moving forward with the best option for consumers in a responsible manner that will be respectful of the Memphis Sand Aquifer and surrounding environment,” reads the document.

Memphis Light, Gas & Water did not find elevated levels of toxins in drinking water wells close to the TVA site last year. After that, TVA ran its five wells for 24 hours, but test results are not back yet.

In response to the discovery of toxins, TVA launched a deeper investigation into the safety of its five wells in late August, contracting with experts from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the University of Memphis to map the underlying geology around the site to better understand the movement of the groundwater (and possible toxins) there. The day after that announcement, state officials said they had a good faith agreement with TVA that it wouldn’t use the wells until after the investigation was complete.

“As a state agency, we need very convincing evidence that the contamination in the upper aquifer does not seep into the lower levels,” Chuck Head, assistant commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC), said at the time.

That investigation was originally projected to take months to complete. But when the plan for that investigation came out in mid-September, USGS and the U of M researchers said they didn’t have enough time to gather enough data to make a clear judgment call on TVA’s wells by the time the agency planned to fire up the plant in December 2017.

“We have committed not to use the aquifer wells until testing shows it is safe to do so,” said TVA spokesman Scott Brooks last week. “We aren’t there yet. However, construction continues on the new gas plant, which is more than 90 percent complete. Our goal is still to have this cleaner generation online by the summer of 2018.”

More help may be on the way for the Memphis Sand Aquifer. Last week, MLGW and Memphis Mayor Jim Strickland proposed a water rate increase that would yield about $1 million each year for aquifer research. About 18 cents would be added to each MLGW water meter each month for the research, to ensure our source of drinking water remains pure and is protected from potential contaminants,” reads the prosper resolution.

The River and the “Poopline”

Bottleneck blues played softly as John Duda’s paint-splotched hands worked on a single glimmer of Mississippi River moonlight. Hours of painting inches in front of a massive canvas yielded a scene of a riverboat chugging slowly toward Memphis, leaving a trail of ripples and sparkles.

Duda’s house in Randolph, about an hour north of Memphis, is filled with his work, mostly scenes of Memphis, the riverfront, and Beale Street. But his finest work may be the view from his back deck.

After he bought the house about 11 years ago, he worked for years to clear kudzu and undergrowth from his spot on the Second Chickasaw Bluff to reveal an expansive view of the Mississippi River, the bluff, and bottom lands beyond. Duda’s view belongs on postcards, but it’s in peril. He shies away from attention, but his fight against that peril has brought him into the spotlight.

From his deck, he pointed to the exact site an 18-inch pipeline that could deliver 3.5 million gallons of industrial waste and treated sewer water into the Mississippi River right below his house.

“It won’t be good,” Duda said. “I understand it’s got to go somewhere and it meets the [Environmental Protection Agency] guidelines. But to put it at the head of a town that’s been here since 1830 or before then is kind of a slap in the face to the people who live here, and the people who visit here, and recreate here.”

Earlier this year, a state plan emerged that would run a pipeline 37 miles from the Memphis Regional Megasite in Haywood County to that spot into the Mississippi below Duda’s house. The pipeline would cross at least 30 bodies of water and carry an estimated 3 million gallons of industrial wastewater from the megasite every day. The pipeline would also carry about 500,000 gallons of treated sewage from the city of Stanton, Tennessee.

State economic development officials have worked for years to prep the 4,100-acre site with $143 million in infrastructure improvements in hopes of luring a large manufacturer to the state. While Toyota-Mazda recently passed on the site, state officials promise prospective clients “the best of everything you need,” including “the best partner, the best location, and the strongest workforce.” Last week, The Jackson Sun reported that state officials said the site needs an additional $72 million to complete work there.

The idea is “terrible, terrible, terrible,” “crappy,” or, simply, “the worst,” according to Renée Hoyos, executive director of the Knoxville-based Tennessee Clean Water Network (TCWN).

“The whole [megasite project] has just gone down this road where I think people are just like, ‘well, we’ve gone this far, how about this idea?'” Hoyos said in a recent interview. “And the ideas are just getting dumber and dumber. They’ve spent all this money, and still no one is coming. It’s not, ‘build it and they will come.’ They’re not coming. So, don’t build.”

Justin Owen, CEO of the Nashville-based Beacon Center, a free-market think tank, recently called the megasite project a “boondoggle” and said that its failure so far was “legendary.”

“And the state now has to run a sewage pipe from the site to the Mississippi River, costing more money and seizing homeowners’ property along the way via eminent domain,” Owen wrote in an opinion piece in The Jackson Sun. “All for a company that is only real in the imaginations of politicians and bureaucrats in Nashville.”

Backlash to the Randolph pipeline solution began this summer. Dozens showed up to oppose the project at TDEC meetings close to the site. A Facebook group called “Say No to the Randolph Poopline (Toxic Sludge)” was organized and quickly grew. But, again, volume is not the main bone of contention in the “poopline” argument with most. It is the location.

At the exact site of the proposed wastewater pipe, sandy beaches appear on the banks of the Mississippi during its regular flow. Duda said people come from near and far to camp at the site, launch kayaks, ride horses, and sit around bonfires. During a recent visit, beer cans, clay pigeons, spent shotgun shells, and ATV tracks evidenced some other, recent recreation.

The site seemed to be picked because it’s close to the where the Mississippi meets the Hatchie River. Flows from the two would help dilute the treated wastewater and send it downstream. Duda said that plan might work when the water was high. But at low levels, an area between the Tennessee side of the river and a mid-stream island gets cut off.

“All of a sudden all of this water gets cut off, and that means 3.5 million gallons [of wastewater] will just be sitting in two, or three, or four pools down through here,” Duda said. “When it’s not mixing, they become cesspools, essentially. Whenever you go by any treatment plant cesspool area, what have they got around it? A chainlink fence with barbed wire to keep people out.”

Duda also feared the pipeline would drive away local wildlife — geese, bald eagles, deer, and more. Years of exposure to the heavy metals in the wastewater would eventually obliterate the spot for human recreation and for the miles of fertile bottomland farms around it for growing corn, soybeans, or cotton.

Environmental dangers loom beyond the spot, too, back along the 37 miles of pipeline that run from the proposed factory and the 30 bodies of water it would cross, said Hoyos.

“That pipe will be under pressure, so you may only notice a problem if it’s a big break,” she said. “But little leaks? You may not notice them. There may be a pollution event that goes on for months and months and months and you may not be able to see them.”

The crowds at the meetings, the Facebook group, and the calls to state lawmakers all delayed a decision on the proposed pipeline last month. It was enough to earn a 30-day extension for public comment on the project. One of those voices for the delay was Shelby County Commissioner Terry Roland.

“This type of discharge will certainly negatively affect the commercial and recreational fishing near Shelby Forest, not to mention the wildlife, to include 43 species on the federal endangered list, popular swimming beaches, boating camping, etc.,” Roland said in a statement at the time.

Justin Fox Burks

Memphis Sewers and The Waters Around Them

The feds have long been after Memphis city officials about its wastewater.

Back about 40 years or so, they forced city officials to treat it before they dumped it into the Mississippi River. Since 2012, the federal agencies have required the city to spend about $250 million over several years to fix and upgrade its weak, leaky wastewater system so the city doesn’t spill untreated sewage into the river (which we have, still, a lot). The city now operates under a consent decree for the improvements agreed to by the TCWN, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Department of Justice, TDEC, and the Office of the Tennessee Attorney General.

In 2010, federal and state agencies filed a formal complaint against the city alleging that “on numerous occasions since 2003” the city illegally spilled untreated sewage into state and federal waters. City officials “failed to properly operate and maintain [its wastewater] facilities” and allowed “visible, floating scum, oil, or other matter contained in the wastewater discharge,” into surrounding waters.

For this, the city paid a civil penalty of about $1.3 million to resolve the violation of the Clean Water Act. It also had to devise a plan to beef up its wastewater system and promise vigilance on clean water issues going forward. But vigilance doesn’t guarantee perfection.

In March and April of 2016, for example, two sewer pipes broke. Both were associated with the T.E. Maxson Waste Water Treatment Plant on President’s Island. One was eight feet tall and another five feet tall. When they broke, they dumped more than 350 million gallons of untreated wastewater into Cypress Creek and McKellar Lake. (For perspective, the damaged Deepwater Horizon well spilled 210 million gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico in 2010.) The spill killed 72,000 fish, spiked levels of E. coli bacteria in the waterways, and left behind layers of sludge.

Justin Fox Burks

John Duda’s house north of Memphis has a great view from the Second Chickasaw Bluff.

Later that year, a three-and-a-half-foot sewer pipe broke close to the M.C. Stiles Waste Water Treatment Plant north of Mud Island. Two-and-a-half million gallons of raw sewage dumped into the Loosahatchie River every day for three days.

In all of the spills, the dirt banks around the pipes had eroded and the pipes broke under their own weight. Correspondence from Memphis leaders show plans are in place to fix those pipes permanently. But Hoyos, with the Tennessee Clean Water Network, said spills like these are “not surprising.”

“You’re going to see [sewage] overflows because, as you’re tightening up a system in certain places, it really accentuates the weaknesses in other sections,” she said.

In a March 2017 letter to Memphis Mayor Jim Strickland, an official with TDEC’s Division of Water Resources said that the city would not only fix the pipes, stabilize its banks, and closely monitor all of them, the city must pay the state damages for the 2016 spills. Those damages were figured at $359,855.98 “for ecological and recreational damage to Cypress Creek and McKellar Lake, excluding damages for fish killed as a direct result of the spill.”

Justin Fox Burks

City of Memphis Public Works Director Robert Knecht said the city is negotiating the terms of that agreement with the state. He said his agency doesn’t like raw sewage spills, of course, but that the city is responsible for 3,200 miles of sewer lines, with 2,800 of those miles of pipes within the city limits. From them, the city’s two wastewater plants process about 60 billion gallons of wastewater each year.

Capital improvements needed for the city’s sewer system, he said, range from $850 million to $1.2 billion. While the consent decree mandated the city spend $250 million, Knecht said it’ll end up spending about $350 million simply because officials discovered about 25 percent more sewer infrastructure after the decree was signed.

The Water City

Many interviewed for this story said they would not swim in the Mississippi River, especially south of the Stiles Waste Water plant. TDEC advises that no one eat fish from the river. Hoyos said that the river drains one third of the United States and has “been used as the nation’s toilet.”

“By the time it gets to Memphis, [the river] is in pretty bad shape,” she said.

All that water, of course, drains into the Gulf of Mexico near New Orleans. There, a “dead zone” bloomed this year the size of New Jersey, the largest on record. For more on this, check out a story in this week’s Fly By, page 6.

Still, given all the perils to the city’s water and waterways, Royer of Outdoors, Inc. believes in Memphis as a “water city” and that its natural resources will be key to its future, and not just for outdoorsy types. Digital technology has given most the ability to work almost anywhere and that puts Memphis in a “real competitive environment” for workers.

“And if the salary is even close, they’ll choose to go to the most livable city,” he said.

Categories
News News Blog

TVA Finds High Arsenic, Lead Levels Near New Wells

High levels of arsenic and other toxins have been discovered in ground water beneath monitoring wells near the Allen Fossil Plant in south Memphis. According to the TVA, which first reported the levels to Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation department in mid-May, arsenic levels were more than 300 times higher than federal drinking water standards. Lead levels in the water were also higher than federal safety standards. The pools were originally installed to monitor pollution from nearby ponds containing slag and ash generated by the plant’s coal-burning.

The TVA’s old Allen coal plant

The polluted groundwater is little more than a quarter mile from five recently drilled TVA wells that will provide cooling water for the agency’s soon-to-be-completed gas-fired power plant. While TDEC officials contend that the polluted groundwater is constrained from contaminating the Memphis Sand Aquifer by a layer of clay, local Sierra Club spokesman Scott Banbury begs to differ.

Here is a statement from the Sierra Club:

The Tennessee Valley Authority has found high levels of arsenic,
lead, and other toxins in groundwater beneath the Allen Fossil Plant, where thousands
of tons of coal ash and boiler slag are stored in massive ponds.
The arsenic was discovered in monitoring wells at the plant at levels more than 300
times the federal drinking-water standard. Excessive amounts of lead were also
detected.

Scientists have linked long-term arsenic exposure to health problems including heart
disease, diabetes and several cancers. Exposure to high lead levels can severely
damage the brain and kidneys in adults or children, and can also be fatal.
The tainted groundwater was found about a quarter-mile from where TVA recently
drilled five wells into the Memphis Sand aquifer, the primary source of local drinking
water. TVA plans to draw 3.5 million gallons a day from the aquifer to cool its gas plant,
though their original plan was to cool the plant with “grey water” from the nearby
Maxson Wastewater Treatment facility.

Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation officials said they don’t think
the arsenic and lead are impacting drinking water, but have asked the Memphis Light,
Gas and Water to test samples anyway.
Justin Fox Burks

Scott Banbury (file photo)

In response to the findings, Scott Banbury, conservation program coordinator for
the Sierra Club in Tennessee, released the following statement:
“This contamination is exactly what we feared when TVA decided to use our pristine
drinking water source to cool its fracked gas plant. We still don’t have enough
information about existing breaches of the clay barrier that protects the aquifer, or about
whether pumping from these wells could pull contaminants into the Memphis Sand
Aquifer.

“TVA should immediately contract with MLGW to use municipal water to cool their new
plant, or reconsider their original plan to use grey water, and should contract with the
University of Memphis Center for Applied Earth Science and Engineering Research to
do an extensive geophysical study of the area around TVA’s ash ponds to make sure
there’s absolutely no risk to the drinking water and public health of Memphis families
and children.

“We also call on the Shelby County Health Department to immediately reconsider their
decision to issue TVA’s well permits in light of this new data.”
Ward Archer, president of Protect Our Aquifer, also weighed in on the findings:

“We suspected the groundwater beneath the Allen plant was already contaminated, but
this is even worse than we had imagined. TVA’s plan to pump Memphis Sand Aquifer
water from beneath this contaminated site is irresponsible and endangers our drinking
water supply.

“These contamination findings reinforce our commitment to encourage TVA to find an
alternative cooling water solution, and we will continue to work to protect our drinking
water aquifer by supporting scientific investigation, raising public awareness, working
with our elected officials, and, when necessary, initiating legal action.”