Categories
News News Blog

German Prosecutors Drop Case Against Former Nazi Guard

Holocaust Research Project

Guards and prisoners at a Neuengamme Concentration Camp.

German officials will not prosecute a man who served a guard at a Nazi concentration camp and was ordered to be removed from the U.S. by a Memphis court in March, according to the Associated Press.

Prosecutors in the city of Celle said they were unable to dispute the account of Friedrich Karl Berger, 95, and dropped the case. Berger told officials he was a guard at a camp near the Neuengamme concentration camp for a few weeks near the end of the war but has said he did not observe any abuse or killings.

Berger, who has lived in the U.S. since 1959, was ordered to leave the U.S. in March by a U.S. Immigration Judge in March after a two-day trial in February. The judge issued an opinion finding Berger removable under the 1978 Holtzman Amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act because his “willing service as an armed guard of prisoners at a concentration camp where persecution took place” constituted assistance in Nazi-sponsored persecution.
[pullquote-2-center] The court found that Berger served at a Neuengamme sub-camp near Meppen, Germany, and that the prisoners there included “Jews, Poles, Russians, Danes, Dutch, Latvians, French, Italians, and political opponents” of the Nazis. The largest groups of prisoners were Russian, Dutch, and Polish civilians.

The judge’s opinion found that Meppen prisoners were held during the winter of 1945 in “atrocious” conditions and were exploited for outdoor forced labor, working “to the point of exhaustion and death.” The court further found, and Berger admitted, that he guarded prisoners to prevent them from escaping during their dawn-to-dusk workday, and on their way to the worksites and also on their way back to the SS-run sub-camp in the evening, according to he court.

At the end of March 1945, as allied British and Canadian forces advanced, the Nazis abandoned Meppen, said the judge’s ruling. The court found that Berger helped guard the prisoners during their forcible evacuation to the Neuengamme main camp — a nearly two-week trip under “inhumane conditions, which claimed the lives of some 70 prisoners.” The decision also cited Berger’s admission that he never requested a transfer from concentration camp guard service and that he continues to receive a pension from Germany based on his employment in Germany, “including his wartime service.”
[pullquote-3-center] The Deutsche Presse-Agentur (dpa) said Berger was charged with assisting in the killing of prisoners between January and April 1945 as he guarded a march to evacuate the camps.

The dpa gave further details in the Berger story Thursday:

“During the period mentioned, the accused was transferred as a German marine soldier to SS Special Inspection VII, which assigned members of the Navy to the Neuengamme concentration camp and its satellite camps as security guards.

“The accused is on a list that was found in 1950 when the German cargo ship ‘Thielbek’ was sunk in the Baltic Sea with thousands of concentration camp inmates before the end of the war. The entry contains the addition ‘Meppen.’ The exact location of the accused during his transfer to the SS is not known.

“In the two satellite camps of the Neuengamme concentration camp in Meppen, foreign forced laborers who were apparently classified as fit for work had been deployed to expand armored trenches and trenches and fortifications since the beginning of 1945. The concentration camp was not an extermination camp.

“Due to overcrowding and a general tightening of the supply situation at the end of WWII, living conditions also deteriorated significantly in the Neuengamme sub-camps. In addition, from the March 23rd-24th, 1945 evacuation marches in the direction of the main camp in Neuengamme, which had been ordered by the SS because the front was approaching, resulting in the death of around 70 exhausted prisoners.
[pullquote-4-center]“Between December 26th, 1944 and March 25th, 1945, a total of 379 prisoners died in both camps and on the evacuation marches. Specific acts of intentional killing were only documented in isolated cases in the two camps, but not during the evacuation marches.

“During interrogations in the U.S., the accused admitted that he had guarded prisoners in the Meppen area for several weeks. He did not observe any mistreatment of prisoners. He was not aware of any deaths among the prisoners. He was not used to guard an evacuation march. Additional information is not to be expected when the accused is questioned in Germany.
[pullquote-5-center]“This admission cannot be refuted to the accused. The granted guarding of prisoners in a concentration camp, which was not used for the systematic killing of the prisoners, is not sufficient as such to prove the crime.

“The U.S. Department of Justice investigation has not linked the accused to any specific killing, in which the accused may have been an accessory.

“No further evidence is available. Surviving prisoners from the two camps are not known. The existing written material was fully evaluated.

“For this reason, the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Celle discontinued the investigation in the absence of sufficient suspicion.”

According to The Oak Ridger newspaper, Berger “has lived for years in Oak Ridge [East Tennessee], but it is not known at this time whether he continues to live in the city.”
[pullquote-1-center] Last month, the federal The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissed Berger’s appeal from the Memphis removal order. He still faces deportation.

“Berger was an active participant in one of the darkest chapters in human history,” said Deputy Assistant Director Louis Rodi of Homeland Security Investigations National Security Investigations Division, which oversees the Human Rights Violators and War Crimes Center. “He attempted to escape his past and start a new life in America, but thanks to the dedication of those at the Department of Justice and Homeland Security Investigations, he will be held accountable. War criminals and violators of human rights will not be allowed to evade justice and find safe haven here.”

Categories
News News Blog

Former SS Nazi Guard Deported by Memphis Judge


A Tennessee resident who was a former Nazi SS guard during WWII has been sent back to Germany by a U.S. immigration judge in Memphis.

U.S. Immigration Judge Rebecca Holt ruled that Friedrich Karl Berger, a German citizen, should be deported to Germany, according to the U.S. Department of Justice. Though Berger’s two-day trial took place in Memphis, court documents did not include the Tennessee city where Berger resided.   

The court ruled that Berger was removable under the 1978 Holtzman Amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act because of Berger’s contribution to Nazi persecution and his “willing service as an armed guard of prisoners at a concentration camp where persecution took place.”

The court found that Berger served as guard at a Neuengamme concentration camp near Meppen, Germany, where prisoners were held in “atrocious conditions, exploited for outdoor forced labor, and working to the point of exhaustion and death.”

Further, Berger admitted to the court that he guarded prisoners to prevent them from escaping.

Holocaust Research Project

Guards and prisoners at a Neuengamme Concentration Camp.


In March 1945, when the Nazis abandoned Meppen, Berger was found to have guarded prisoners on a “forcible evacuation” to another camp. The evacuation was a nearly two-week trip, in which approximately 70 prisoners died, according to the court.

Finally, the court found that Berger is still receiving a pension from Germany for his “wartime service.”

Berger was part of the SS machinery of oppression that kept concentration camp prisoners in atrocious conditions of confinement,” said Brian Benczkowski, Assistant Attorney General for DOJ’s criminal division.”

According to the DOJ, since it began efforts to investigate and remove Nazi prosecutors in 1979, it has successfully removed 109 individuals from the country.

Categories
News News Blog

Rhodes Gets Grant to Prevent, Respond to Sexual Assault, Other Crimes on Campus

Facebook/Rhodes College


Rhodes College received a $300,000 federal grant to enhance its prevention of and response to sexual assault and related crimes on campus, the school announced Friday.

The grant from the U.S. Department of Justice will fund a coordinated effort to improve programs related to preventing and responding to sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking on campus.

Specifically, the funds will be used for five purposes.

• Rhodes will created a Coordinated Community Response Team to enhance the school;s response, prevention, and education related to the four crimes above. The team will review policies and procedures.

• In collaboration with the Shelby County Crime Victims and Rape Crisis Center (SCCVRCC), Rhodes plans to enhance its mandatory prevention program for incoming students and introduce ongoing trainings for returning students. The trainings will include a bystander intervention component, with a special emphasis on students who live on campus, belong to Greek organizations, or are students athletes.

• Rhodes will also implement new-hire and ongoing quarterly or semi-annual training for campus safety personnel, disciplinary boards, and faculty and staff. These trainings will also focus on Greek life, on-campus residencies, and athletics.

• The college will implement a total of five prevention campaigns on campus, again targeting those who live on campus, belong to Greek organizations, or are students athletes.

• Finally, Rhodes will hire a project coordinator to develop and manage the aforementioned programs

According to Rhodes’ 2019 Security and Fire Safety Report, the total number of sexual offenses on campus saw a dramatic decrease between 2016 and 2018. There were a total of 19 reported sexual offenses on campus in 2016. In 2017, that number dropped to four, and then rose to nine last year.

In 2018, the college had three instances of dating violence and four stalking incidents. In 2017, there were two cases of dating violence, and 1 stalking incident. The college had three cases of dating violence and two reported stalking incidents in 2016.

There were no reported cases of domestic violence in the last three years.


Categories
News The Fly-By

New Initiative Aims to Curb Domestic Violence

Kamekio Lewis still remembers the night her former boyfriend chased after her with a knife as she ran barefoot through a neighborhood. When she slipped and fell, she was captured, dragged through the nearby woods by her hair, and brutally beaten.

“He took me to an abandoned house,” Lewis recalled. “My mom ended up finding me some kind of way the next day. Charges were filed: kidnapping [and] assault. I ended up having to be hospitalized. I had a concussion.”

Lewis’ abusive relationship lasted more than two years before she escaped by entering the army. She hasn’t looked back since.

A new comprehensive response to domestic violence, called the Blueprint for Safety, has been launched to aid people in situations like Lewis’. The initiative is intended to assist victims from the time they experience domestic violence and contact a 911 operator through law enforcement’s response and the offender’s prosecution.

Lewis’ story of domestic abuse is all too common. There were 247,069 reports of domestic violence offenses made to the Tennessee Incident Based Reporting System (TIBRS) program from 2011 to 2013. More than 70 percent of victims were women. Across the nation, one in four women is projected to report domestic abuse at some point in their lives. Domestic violence typically involves physical, emotional, verbal, economic, and/or sexual abuse by one person against their spouse or partner.

Last Thursday, Shelby County’s Blueprint for Safety initiative was introduced during a news conference at the Urban Child Institute. Members of city and county government, local law enforcement, the U.S. Attorney for the Western District’s office, Shelby County District Attorney General’s office, General Sessions Division 10, and the Family Safety Center will collectively implement the program.

The initiative seeks to enhance services provided by 911 dispatchers, law enforcement, and victim/witness services to domestic violence victims. It will also strengthen the rehabilitative efforts provided to offenders by the county’s domestic violence court.

The Blueprint for Safety is being funded by a $300,000 federal grant administered through the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Office on Violence Against Women (OVM).

“The Blueprint for Safety is an approach to domestic violence cases that coordinates agency responses around the shared goals of safety and justice,” said Bea Hanson, principal deputy director of OVM. “It closes the gaps between what victims of violent crime need from the criminal justice system and the way in which the system is currently responding. The whole point of the Blueprint is to make sure that we’re keeping victims safe and holding offenders accountable.”

Memphis is the fourth city to adopt the DOJ’s Blueprint for Safety model. The initiative is already being implemented in St. Paul and Duluth, Minnesota, as well as New Orleans, Louisiana.

Although it was revealed during the news conference that around 8,000 domestic violence cases occur in the Memphis area annually, the offense appears to be on the decline. According to Operation: Safe Community data, reported cases of domestic violence have decreased more than 16 percent locally since 2011.

The Family Safety Center has been connecting victims of domestic violence with civil, criminal, health, and social services since 2012.

Olliette Murry-Drobot, executive director of Family Safety Center, said the nonprofit would play a central role in helping fully implement and sustain the Blueprint for Safety initiative.

“[We] work closest with victims and have direct knowledge of the impact that the criminal justice system has in the lives of victims,” Murry-Drobot said. “Our tasks are to keep the criminal justice system focused on the experiences of victims and to ensure that their responses keep those experiences at the center of what they do.”

Categories
News

Delay Requested in County Schools Case

As expected, the Shelby County school system board of education and other parties have asked for a delay in the appointment of a “special master” to oversee compliance with a federal desegregation order.

A joint motion was filed this week to extend the 30-day deadline set by U.S. District Judge Bernice Donald in her order of July 26th, 2007. The special master is supposed to be someone who is a neutral expert in school desegregation. Donald said county schools should not be racially identifiable and should strive to reflect the overall racial makeup of the district, plus or minus 15 percent.

The county school board has appealed Donald’s order to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. The motion asks that the special master appointment be delayed until 10 days following the board’s motion for a stay — or in other words, a delay while the appeals court decides whether to take the case.

Joining in the motion were attorneys representing the NAACP and the U.S. Department of Justice.