Categories
Letter From The Editor Opinion

Letter from the Editor: “Extraordinarily bad”

The recent tornado in Joplin, Missouri, my home state, was a sobering reminder that, despite advance warnings and fancy Doppler radar, there is little anyone can do if a massive tornado delivers a direct strike — except hide and hope.

Last weekend, an article by the Associated Press called “Questions and Answers About Tornadoes” ran in newspapers around the country, including The Commercial Appeal. The article noted that this year was “extraordinarily bad,” with the highest tornado death toll of any year on record.

The next question the AP addressed was: “Can the intensity of this year’s tornadoes be blamed on climate change?” According to the AP: “Probably not.” No sources were given for that absurd claim.

The earth is indisputably getting warmer. Nine of the last 10 years have been the hottest on record. Glaciers and Arctic ice fields are melting. Sea levels are rising. The world’s climate scientists say that a warmer earth means more moisture in the air, which means more dramatic weather swings, more drought, more flooding, bigger storms.

Consider: Parts of Texas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico are experiencing drought conditions worse than those of the Dust Bowl years. There were record snowfall and rainfall amounts across much of the upper Midwest, which brought record flooding to the South. The Amazon basin has just gone through its second “100-year drought” in the last five years. A heat wave last summer destroyed much of Russia’s grain crops. There have been record mega-floods in Australia, New Zealand, and Pakistan this year. And, of course, April’s wave of tornadoes in the U.S. was the worst on record. That’s just a partial list of weather anomalies cited by the Global Climate Campaign’s Bill McKibben in a recent Washington Post article.

There are those, of course, who argue that the earth has always gone through cycles of warming and cooling. Glaciers once covered much of North America. Skeptics say that modern man’s loading of the atmosphere with carbon from fossil fuels has nothing to do with the fact that the planet is getting warmer. They say it’s natural, and there is nothing we can do but try to adapt.

If so, we’d better get used to more floods, more frequent and powerful tornadoes and hurricanes, record annual snowfalls, long droughts, withering heat waves — and less beachfront property. We can’t do anything about it, so we just need to watch the Doppler and hope for the best and take what we’ve got coming to us. Science is for sissies, right?

Bruce VanWyngarden

brucev@memphisflyer.com

Categories
Letters To The Editor Opinion

Letters to the Editor

Title X

Jackson Baker’s Viewpoint column “Measuring Frankly” (May 26th issue) contained some information that is somewhat misleading.

Baker describes the anti-abortion measure known as SJR 127 as “a constitutional amendment (subject to a statewide vote in 2014) that put the state on record as being ‘neutral’ in its attitude toward abortion — a move regarded as a precondition for any future scaling back of the state’s various legal responsibilities vis-à-vis abortion.”

SJR 127 would actually change Tennessee’s Declaration of Rights so that women are no longer guaranteed equality under the law. It puts government in charge of women’s health, allowing the Tennessee General Assembly to enact unreasonable restrictions on abortion, including medically unnecessary waiting periods and sonogram requirements. It could even outlaw abortion altogether. It injects politicians firmly into what is one of the most personal medical decisions a woman and her family ever face. Women should be able to make that decision with their faith, their families, and their physician without government interference.

SJR 127 is an extreme measure that makes no exception for victims of rape and incest or women with life-threatening medical conditions. If it is approved by the voters in 2014, Tennessee will have the dubious distinction of being the first state in the nation to amend its constitution to take rights away from citizens. Baker’s vague description of SJR 127 did not make clear just how harmful the measure could be to Tennesseans.

To set the record straight, the federal family-planning funding targeted by a budget amendment to deny poor women options in their health care by Representative Stacey Campfield (R-Knoxville), which Baker also mentions, is known as Title X, not Title IX.

Joan Carr, Director of Community Affairs

Planned Parenthood Greater

Memphis Region

Flood Coverage

As a former Memphian who reads the Flyer online, I want to compliment your coverage of the great flood of 2011 — before, during, and after. There was no other local online news source that compared to the Flyer in its straight reporting, interesting analysis and commentary, and varied blog posts and photos.

John R. Collins

Chicago, Illinois

Those Crazy Libs

This town never ceases to amaze me. Just when you think the city might finally move past the irreversible damage done by liberal cancers Friends for Our Riverfront and Memphis Heritage, along comes another wave of pestilence to pick away at Memphis’ future.

This time, the disease is being wielded by a minute group of loud-mouth, goofy, foam-hat-wearing metrosexuals who fantasize that people really give a good gas pass about bicycles.

It is sad that local government is so weak as to give these fools anything more than a swift kick to their backsides. How idiotic is it to even consider as anything more than a lame joke the idea of creating single-lane traffic on an important and already busy street so a group of pantyhose-wearing sissy boys can pretend to save the earth?

These liberal buffoons must lay awake nights dreaming up ways to hurt local business and keep Memphis from prospering.

Oops! Sorry to have opened my car door. I didn’t see you coming. Okay, so I did see you coming. You got me!

Tommy Volinchak

Memphis

Government Shutdown

Everybody look what’s going down. If you think the government is functioning improperly now, watch what happens if anti-tax Republicans shut it down. The GOP obviously didn’t learn its lesson when it shut the government down in 1996.

Destroying America’s credit is no small matter. It’s outrageous to risk doing so for political gain, but the Republicans and the Tea Party seem determined to play chicken with the debt ceiling. If Congress is blocked by the GOP from raising the national debt ceiling, by the beginning of August, the Treasury will be deciding which bills to pay. The U.S. would have to begin defaulting on some Treasury notes and bonds as they come due. Some pension funds and insurance companies that are huge holders of Treasury notes would have to dump them, because they’re prohibited from owning the debt of institutions that are in default.

The GOP and Tea Party threatening not to raise the debt ceiling is not just playing with fire but playing with fire in a dynamite factory.

Ron Lowe

Nevada City, California

Memphis Flyer encourages reader response. Send mail to: Letters to the Editor, POB 1738, Memphis, TN 38101. Or send us e-mail at letters@memphisflyer.com. All responses must include name, address, and daytime phone number. Letters should be no longer than 250 words.

Categories
Editorial Opinion

“Safe and Free”

The weekend’s various Memorial Day celebrations were reminders to all of us of the sacrifices made over the nearly 250 years of our country’s history by the brave men and women who have taken up arms to defend our freedoms — often at the cost of their lives.

The visit to Memphis on Tuesday of Hedy Weinberg, executive director of the Tennessee chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, was a reminder that the battle on behalf of those freedoms goes on in civil spheres as well.

In a luncheon speech to members of the Memphis Rotary Club, Weinberg took note of the prevailing impression that the ACLU had an ideological tilt to the left and promptly set about demolishing what she described as a serious misconception.

Among the organizations that the ACLU has offered its legal services to on behalf of challenged or suppressed constitutional rights have been such conservative institutions as the far-right Eagle forum and various chamber of commerce groups, Weinberg pointed out. The state chapter is supported by some 3,200 members and supporters and by private donations, she said.

She recounted particular cases in Tennessee — one involving a self-described “Christ-centered student preacher” in Nashville who had been denied a permit to carry out charitable efforts on behalf of the homeless in public spaces. Weinberg said the ACLU was able to demonstrate that the barrier between church and state that was invoked in this case was based on too literal an interpretation of the Constitution. The Bill of Rights actually guaranteed the apprentice minister’s right to do as he was doing, she said.

Another case involved the support of a retired couple — “Reagan Republicans” — in their efforts to maintain voting rights in the course of an extended journey around the country in an RV.

“We are embracing the change of the state,” Weinberg said — a declaration suggesting both the ACLU’s awareness of changing demographics and changing political attitudes in Tennessee. Contrary to popular supposition, requests for ACLU support were not restricted to the major cities but included rural areas as well, she said.

Commenting that questions of security had become uppermost since the events of 9/11, Weinberg said many elements of the Patriot Act were perfectly acceptable and even necessary, but others were suspect. Asked for an example, she mentioned Section 215 of the act, which, she said, “requires libraries and mental health centers to make available to the feds private information without probable cause” — reading habits in the one case, private medical circumstances in the other.

“Our mantra is ‘safe and free,'” she proclaimed, and it was hard to see how that slogan differed at all from those which rang out so loud and clear at the weekend’s Memorial Day remembrances.

Indeed, Weinberg’s appearance seemed to us to segue very nicely with all those events.

Categories
Politics Politics Feature

Cohen vs. Hart

“I haven’t filed yet, but I plan to.” With those words, texted to the Flyer on Tuesday, Memphis City Schools board member Tomeka Hart confirmed persistent recent rumors that she intended to challenge 9th District congressman Steve Cohen in the 2012 Democratic primary.

Cohen himself had taken note of the likelihood during an interview last month in Washington. At the time, he had not identified his prospective opponent by name, except to say that he expected organized opposition and that his challenger would be a well-known African-American woman.

That definition certainly fits Hart, the executive director of the Memphis Urban League and, with fellow MCS board member Martavius Jones, the leader in last year’s vote to surrender the MCS charter, thereby setting in motion the pending merger of MCS with Shelby County Schools.

“It’s all set,” Cohen said, indicating that his then unnamed opponent would be drawing on sources of support similar to those which had opposed him in his previous congressional races in 2006, 2008, and 2010.

“They’re going to try to revive the idea of a ‘consensus black candidate,'” predicted Cohen, who said that was the tack taken in such campaigns as those of independent Jake Ford in 2006 and Democratic candidates Nikki Tinker and Willie Herenton in 2008 and 2010, respectively. All these challenges fell significantly short, the last two being on the short end of 4 to 1 outcomes.

“It didn’t work then, and it won’t work now,” the congressman said confidently. “My track record is clear, that I have faithfully represented the African-American community, and the results show that the voters know that.”

Hart, a lawyer, was elected to the MCS board in 2004, defeating longtime incumbent Hubon “Dutch” Sandridge. She served as the board president from January 2008 to June 2009. • The impasse in city budget negotiations is keeping another matter, that of redistricting of city council districts, on the back burner.

Municipal elections are scheduled for October 6th. The filing deadline for them is July 21st, with a withdrawal deadline of a week later. And potential candidates, like local blogger Steve Ross of vibinc.com, who is contemplating a run for a council seat, are complaining that the council has been unreasonably tardy in redrawing district lines.

The 2010 census information for Shelby County, which would provide the basis for redistricting, has been available since March 16th, Ross notes on his blog. He points out that his residence, as of now, is at a point close to several existing district lines and that, with less than two months to go before showtime, his preparations for organizing a campaign are hampered by not knowing where that campaign is to be run.

Ross, who addressed the council on the subject some weeks ago, says he was given no guidelines by council attorney Allan Wade, who, however, promised more information next week, at the council’s June 6th meeting.

From Ross’ blog: “Certainly, there are difficult decisions to be made and stringent rules that must be followed. The consent decree that governs the drawing of districts in Memphis has very particular guidelines. From my perspective, these rules are one of the most important reasons there must be public scrutiny of the process, never-mind the whole notion of ‘open government’ itself.

“For me, the issue is less about ‘why hasn’t this been done’ than ‘why isn’t more information available about this.’ Because, aside from an ordinance on third reading, there is nothing. No maps, no information, nothing. And my attempts to find out more about this process have yielded very little concrete information, calling the process into question, which is concerning to a person, like myself, who believes that the public’s trust in government comes not from the officials, but from the easy availability of information.”

Ross got some moral support this week from council member Jim Strickland. “I think Steve is justifiably concerned that the districts have not been set, and we’re only seven weeks prior to filing deadline,” said Strickland, who added, “I’ve spoken to Allan Wade, and he has a problem matching the census figures with the precinct.”

The councilman (a candidate for reelection in District 5, after all) said he, too, hoped the matter could be expedited.

• Almost unnoticed in the recent press of events (budgetary dilemmas not the least of them), the U.S. Department of Homeland Security made an announcement last week that, in response to the recently concluded congressional deal that pared $780 from the federal budget, Homeland Security would be cutting $170 million from its Urban Areas Security Initiative program.

In practical terms, that means that both Memphis and Nashville are slated to lose millions in grant money that had been used to upgrade technology and training over the last seven years, during which the two Tennessee cities had received some $40 million between them. Last year, Memphis’ share was $4.1 million; Nashville’s, $2.8 million.

The money had been used for such purposes as enhancing communication capabilities among police, fire, and other emergency officials; providing bomb squads with new equipment and training; and even funding the training of bomb-sniffing dogs.

• As the metaphor has it, the fat lady has sung — which is to say, the 2011 session of the Tennessee General Assembly came to an end Saturday before last — but she may have a few unexpected extra verses to warble.

In addition to several bills that were shelved or left hanging — the “innovative school districts” bill that had troubled the Shelby County Commission, the “Don’t Say Gay” bill of state senator Stacey Campfield (R-Knoxville), among others — some bills that did get through are already being revisited.

There is, for example, the very real probability that a bill intended to cut Planned Parenthood out of the loop for federal Title X family-planning funds was nullified by add-on language that is just now coming to light. A provision was added (or retained, against the wishes of sponsor Campfield) stating that the defunding provision “shall not be construed to supersede applicable provisions of federal and state law.” Meaning: The status quo on Title X funding shall be observed.

And another controversial measure, HB 600, banning antidiscrimination ordinances by local jurisdictions, is sure to be challenged early in the next legislative session. State senator Jim Kyle (D-Memphis), the Senate’s Democratic leader, has already filed legislation designed to repeal that measure, which drew intense last-minute opposition from several major Tennessee industries, including FedEx of Memphis.

In signing HB 600 into law, Governor Bill Haslam said the business opposition had come too late to affect his judgment. Acknowledging that “the business community was late to the party,” Kyle said the new law was still “worth a second look.”

Gay and lesbian activists had lobbied extensively against HB 600, and much of the business opposition was in the context of author Richard Florida’s thesis that economic innovation is largely dependent on the input of a “creative class,” which includes gays, high-tech specialists, and other heterodox types.

Kyle said that reaction from constituents in Memphis and Shelby County, where antidiscrimination ordinances were still being actively considered, had also prompted his filing the bill.

• Give state representative Curry Todd his due. Todd (R-Collierville) — he of the Mexicans-as-teeming-rats metaphor at a notorious committee hearing last fall, he of the Norris-Todd school-merger bill — was the reason one special-interest bill got stopped cold.

This was SB 1033, introduced by state senator Bill Ketron (R-Murfreesboro) and designed, according to its caption, to prohibit and provide criminal penalties for “certain union and employee organization activities,” spelled out by Ketron as “bribery, extortion, intimidation, and disorderly conduct.”

When the bill came through the Senate Judiciary Committee on April 26th, it was stoutly resisted by state senator Beverly Marrero (D-Memphis), who pointed out the one-sidedness of the measure, which targeted labor only and mentioned potential management transgressions not at all, but the bill was passed through on a 6-3 party-line vote.

On the last legislative day, however, when the bill came through the House for final passage, Todd returned to another issue that Marrero had mentioned — namely, that none of the iniquities which it mentioned had turned up in Tennessee itself; that, in fact, the bill was a hobby-horse mounted by the National Chamber of Commerce in each of the 50 states. Indeed, the chief spokesman for it had been a Nashville attorney representing the chamber.

None too gently, Todd pointed out that the bill had nothing to do with Tennessee and promptly moved it off the calendar and back to the House’s state and local government committee, out of harm’s way, at least for the current calendar year.

Moral of the story? For all of the one-party domination of the 2011 session, there were a few such independent gestures. But not many.

Categories
Opinion Viewpoint

The Root of Evil

“Counter to the prevailing expectation that crime would increase during a recession,” it actually dropped last year, and violent crime is now at nearly a 40-year low. So said The New York Times last week. But what the Times did not report is precisely why it was so surprised to learn, yet again and probably not for the last time, how the “prevailing expectation” may be limited to people who think, as did Marx (Karl maybe, Groucho for sure), that money is the root of all evil. On the contrary, evil is.

I pick on the Times out of tough love. The paper’s evident surprise at the falling crime rate shows a remarkable tenacity in clinging to shopworn and disproved dogma. Crime is not committed by good people who lose their jobs. It is committed by criminals who never had real jobs in the first place.

The drop in the crime rate is indeed newsworthy and a bit mysterious. No one is exactly sure what is going on. Is the reduction caused by changed demographics — fewer young men — or an increased incarceration rate (no longer the case) or the good ol’ zeitgeist? Whatever the reason, the results are wonderful. The chances of being murdered or robbed are now half of what they were in the early 1990s, although there are some disquieting signs that the good days may be coming to an end. New York City, which for some time has led the nation in crime reduction, is having an itsy-bitsy crime wave — murders, rapes, robberies, and assaults are up. Still, a little perspective is in order. New York had 536 murders last year. In 1990, the figure was 2,245.

Certain kinds of crime might be affected by a recession. Domestic abuse, even murder, might be triggered by overcrowding and unemployment. But the key category of robbery, the one that numerous experts thought would rise on account of the recession, fell 9.5 percent nationwide. The Times dutifully quoted experts who were puzzled by this.

I am not. A person who loses his or her job is not likely to pick up a gun and rob someone in the street or climb through a second-story window. There are several reasons for this, the first being that people who had jobs are not likely to be criminals or criminally minded. Even if they had engaged in white-collar crime, violent crime would hardly be the next step. Another reason is the social safety net. Before the unemployed reach for a gun, they are more likely to reach for an unemployment insurance application. This, I think, is a much easier way of replacing some income.

My own expert in such matters is Neil Gilbert, Chernin Professor of Social Welfare and co-director of the Center for Child and Youth Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He points out that recessions are periods of social conservatism — the ’20s roared, the ’30s most definitely did not. When people lose jobs, they move back in with their parents or with relatives. Families enforce social norms. People need one another. It’s no time for general mayhem.

I would never argue that economics is not an important — and sometimes paramount — factor in social behavior, and, surely, a truly starving person will resort to crime, if need be. But the expectation that bad times will produce bad people is a consequence of the belief that social welfare programs will solve social welfare problems: The more you have of the former, the less you have of the latter. This is sometimes the case — food stamps, etc., are a necessity — but the belief that crime rises as budgets are cut is a fallacy. It infantilizes the poor: Without bread and circuses, they will riot.

The shock inherent in the Times story, the bafflement over crime rates that seem unaffected by unemployment, is a meme of the left. It has its roots in an admirable desire to help the less fortunate and to enlist government in that effort. It’s no more perverse than the right’s insistence that culture is everything and all social programs are a waste of money. But we have known for a long time that, if just from stories our parents and grandparents tell, hard times do not make hardened criminals. Robbers don’t rob because they’re out of work; they rob because robbery is the kind of work they do.

Richard Cohen writes for the Washington Post Writers Group.

Categories
Cover Feature News

Do Ask, Do Tell

You might recognize Tim Smith’s face.

Back in October 2009, Smith’s image — clad in his decorated Marine-issue uniform with his right hand in a salute — graced a billboard on Poplar Avenue downtown, bearing the words, “I’m gay and I protected your freedom.”

Less than a week later, vandals had ripped down the billboard, and though the culprits were never apprehended, the story made national headlines. The billboard was one of five featuring prominent gay or gay-friendly Memphians installed around town by the Memphis Gay & Lesbian Community Center for National Coming Out Day. Smith’s was the only one that was vandalized.

“It felt like a punch in the gut when the billboard was torn down. I was absolutely sick to my stomach with frustration and anger,” said the 28-year-old former Marine logistician who, years after being booted from the Marines under the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy, still sports his military buzz-cut.

“And then the community realized that we had to respond in a positive way. We couldn’t give somebody the satisfaction of thinking this was an action we would take lying down,” he said.

The event galvanized the local gay community, leading to unity rallies and a fight for equal rights locally. That philosophy of turning something negative into something positive comes naturally to Smith.

He took the same attitude when he was kicked out of the Marines for being gay in August 2005.

“I decided, from that point on, that I would fight Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell on the flipside,” Smith said. “I swore to myself when I was discharged that I would fight until the day it was over.”

Smith joined the “Call to Duty” tour in the spring of 2006, a cross-country college tour promoting Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell repeal. He did radio interviews, and he was featured in The New York Times.

Last December, Smith’s work — and the work of so many other equal-rights advocates — paid off when President Barack Obama signed a bill repealing the 17-year-old Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy.

“Clearly, this is President Obama’s Lyndon Johnson moment in history,” said Aubrey Sarvis, Army veteran and executive director for the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network in a statement last December. “A measure of dignity has been restored to thousands of service members on active duty and to over a million gay veterans who served in silence.”

But it’s not safe yet for gay service members to come out. First, each branch of the armed services must complete member training around how repeal will work. Training in the Navy, Air Force, and Marines should be complete by the end of June, and the Army plans to wrap up by August. After all branches complete training, it will be another 60 days before repeal is official.

A Born Marine

Growing up in Falkner, Mississippi, Smith knew from an early age that he wanted to serve in the armed forces. Some of his family members had military backgrounds, and he planned to follow in their footsteps.

“My parents made me wait until I was able to sign for myself. They supported it, but they wanted it to be my decision,” Smith said. “I chose the Marines because, if I was going to serve, I wanted to serve in the best.”

Smith joined the Marines in 2001, when he was 18 years old, eight years after former President Bill Clinton signed the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy into law. That policy mandated the discharge of openly gay, lesbian, or bisexual service members. More than 14,000 people have been booted out for being gay since the measure was passed in 1993.

But at the time he joined the Marines, Smith didn’t think that policy would affect him.

“I knew I wasn’t completely heterosexual, but based on my religious upbringing and where I came from in the woods of Mississippi, I figured [my same-sex attraction] was a phase that would pass,” Smith said.

He graduated boot camp in August 2001, after a year at Northeast Mississippi Community College. He was stationed in Beaufort, South Carolina, and was soon after deployed to Spain and then the Middle East.

“I loved the Marines,” Smith said. “I liked the physical aspect and camaraderie. You get the opportunity to see a lot of interesting places on Uncle Sam’s dime. You get job skills. It’s pretty much a win-win.”

Although Smith began to question his sexuality in college and during Marine training, he tried to deny his same-sex attraction by marrying his high school sweetheart. The marriage only lasted a year before Smith realized it wasn’t meant to be. The couple divorced, and Smith confided to a few friends about his homosexual feelings.

Smith began to feel like he was leading a double life. It was okay to talk with friends about being gay, but he had to remain in the closet at work.

“You had to see through the green to get to the rainbow,” Smith said. “Everybody knew certain clubs far away from base where you could go. There was a hidden network underneath the surface.”

Having friends in the large gay communities of nearby Atlanta and Charleston gave Smith some solace, and he would often make the drives to those cities to hang out with likeminded people. He eventually met a partner, another Marine who was stationed at Parris Island, South Carolina.

But one can only hide for so long. Turns out, Smith’s command staff had known his secret for some time, but they’d chosen not to speak up.

“They knew I was coming up for a promotion and that it wouldn’t affect my work. They didn’t have a huge problem with it,” Smith said. “But their hand was forced by an outside party, and that’s when the house fell down.”

The Outing

That house was blown over by gossiping parishioners at Smith’s former church, the one he and his ex-wife had attended when they were still married. The head of the Marine chaplain corps where Smith was stationed had retired and taken the pastor position at that church.

“I had gone to that church for about a year, but I didn’t feel like it was a safe place after [my divorce],” Smith said. “Obviously, people knew what happened, and congregants told the pastor. Then he confronted me about it.”

The pastor offered Smith a deal: Attend an ex-gay ministry and try to seek reconciliation with his ex-wife or the pastor would see that Smith was discharged under Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. Smith, who was just becoming comfortable with his homosexuality, refused to go into ex-gay therapy.

“When I refused to go to the change ministry, [the pastor] turned what he knew over to the command staff and pushed their hand on it,” Smith said. “He was high enough in rank when he was in [service], and he was well-connected. [The command staff’s] hands were pretty much tied. He told them if they didn’t take care of it, he would.”

Smith was given the option of a guaranteed honorable discharge or taking his chances with an official Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell investigation, meaning authorities would seek proof from photos or witnesses that Smith had engaged in what the military calls “homosexual conduct.”

According to the policy, that includes 1) a statement that one is gay, 2) a homosexual act, attempted act, or solicitation of an act, or 3) a marriage or attempted marriage to someone of the same sex. A “homosexual act” can be something as simple as holding hands in a public park, according to the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network.

“I knew all it would take would be them turning over a couple of stones to see that I was very active in the gay community in Atlanta and Charleston,” Smith said.

So Smith admitted that he was gay, taking the honorable discharge route. After his discharge, Smith’s partner also came out and was immediately discharged. The two are still friends, but they ended their relationship shortly after their discharges.

Smith moved to Memphis to study education at the University of Memphis, and he joined the “Call to Duty” tour to fight for Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell reform. He appeared on the National Coming Out Day billboard, becoming something of a local celebrity in the Memphis gay community.

But Smith will soon be leaving the Bluff City to take a teaching job in Indianapolis with Teach for America. He wants to join the National Guard or Army Reserve when he’s legally able to do so.

“I’ve started another phase of my life, but I definitely feel like the military is still a part of me. I want to continue in service,” Smith said. “In a couple of years, if I’ve accomplished some of the goals I’m pursuing, I’ll most certainly go back.”

So long as members were discharged solely for violation of the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy, they may rejoin once repeal is official. A spokesperson with the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network predicts that repeal will go into effect by the end of October.

Changing Times

When Clinton signed the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy into law in 1993, it was seen as a compromise to appease both gay-rights advocates and those who believed the military should continue to ban homosexuals from service. Pre-1993, there was an outright ban on gays in the military, but Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell prohibited investigations into members’ sexuality without suspicion.

According to a Time magazine article on treatment of gays in military history, the Army, Navy, and Selective Service system during World War II developed methods for screening out gay men that included looking for feminine characteristics and dress or an expanded rectum. More than 4,000 gay men had been rejected for service by the end of World War II.

As recently as 1982, the Department of Defense issued a directive stating that homosexuality was clearly incompatible with military service. That was just one year before Memphian Sean Alexander joined the Army.

Like Smith, Alexander, who has served as a co-chair of Mid-South Pride in recent years, didn’t know he gay when he enlisted. He was only 19 in 1983, and he was following in the footsteps of his grandfather, a retired Army major who served in World War II.

“He went down to the station the day they swore me in. It really swelled my heart with pride,” Alexander said.

But Alexander began to discover his sexual orientation while he was serving. He got the first clue from a fellow officer.

“My first duty station after basic training was in Germany, and there was a young lady in our unit who was obviously tomboyish,” Alexander said. “We got together one night at the enlisted’s club, and she pulled me over to protect her from the other guys who were interested in her. She told me she and I had something in common and that I probably didn’t even know it. I didn’t know what she was talking about, but later, that statement rang very true.”

Alexander’s fellow officer was hinting that he was gay, and though he didn’t fully figure that out until leaving the Army for the Reserve in 1986, he didn’t dare confess his same-sex attraction to other officers.

“I think the people in my unit might have been okay with it, but once it got higher in the ranks, they probably would have asked me to leave the military,” Alexander said.

When serving at his last duty station before leaving the Army, Alexander went out with a friend from the barracks. They went to a concert and ended up club-hopping afterward.

“We ended up at a gay bar, and I would see two guys in one corner or two girls in another corner,” Alexander said. “I’m sure us GI’s stood out like a sore thumb, but I felt more comfortable, like these were my people. I didn’t know why, but I felt more like the club kids than the military guys.”

Alexander thinks Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell repeal will be a smooth transition for modern service members.

“With the younger generation being more open-minded, it will be easy,” he said.

Smith agrees, in part, because the military instills a sense of professionalism and because members are trained to follow whatever orders they’re given. He said some older or very conservative members may struggle with repeal, but he thinks this could be a teaching moment.

“This could be just like racial integration,” Smith said. “I know so many people, even in the modern military, who grew up in rural Alabama or Mississippi, and they didn’t have any interaction with people of other ethnicities or races or religions. And now they have.”

Critics of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell repeal have argued that allowing gay members to serve openly could damage unit cohesion. However, a Pentagon survey of 115,000 service members and 44,266 spouses released in November found that 92 percent said they could work with gay and lesbian service members.

“This won’t hurt unit morale,” Smith said. “It will help unit morale because people can be honest with themselves. And honesty increases harmony.”

Categories
We Recommend We Recommend

Get Crazy

What’s better than a Gershwin musical? A better Gershwin musical, of course, and that is what Lend Me a Tenor writer Ken Ludwig set out to create when he penned Crazy for You, a Tony winner that opened on Broadway in 1992 to rave reviews. Ludwig’s script is a reworking of Gershwin’s Girl Crazy, a lighter-than-air story about star-crossed love and putting on a show. The songs collected in Crazy for You include “Someone To Watch Over Me,” “Embraceable You,” “They Can’t Take That Away From Me,” “I Got Rhythm,” “Nice Work If You Can Get It,” and a whole lot more.

On Thursday, June 2nd, Gershwin fans can take in Crazy for You at Theatre Memphis while helping to support a good cause. The Community Legal Center, a nonprofit that provides representation in civil matters to people who can’t afford legal counsel, is hosting its annual night at the theater fund-raiser. Starting at 6 p.m., partiers can enjoy wine, beer, and heavy hors d’oeuvres while bidding on items in the Community Legal Center’s silent auction. The show starts at 7:30 p.m. Tickets are $40.

“Crazy for You,” the Community Legal Center’s annual night at the theater fund-raiser, Thursday, June 2nd, at 6 p.m. For tickets, information, or to make a contribution to the Community Legal Center, call 543-3395.

Categories
We Recommend We Recommend

Other People’s Trash …

“I never thought banana peels could be so attractive,” Babbie Lovett enthuses.

As it turns out, Lovett enthuses a lot when talking about the Curb Couture Trashion Show, a benefit for Memphis City Beautiful which will feature fashions made from recycled and found items and trash — such as T-shirts adorned with bits of dried fruits and vegetables. “It’s going to be out-of this-world — [Lady] Gaga kind of style,” says Lovett, director of the show.

The event will take place outside the Cannon Center with a runway area decorated by Garden District. There will be the runway show and models and dancers mingling in the audience. Mannequins featuring some of the styles will be up for auction. A DJ will spin music, and there will be food from Majestic Grille and drinks, of course. There could even be a sighting or two of hunky shirtless “garbage” men.

According to Lovett, with a few exceptions, all the fashions — some 30-plus — are wearable. Kittie Kyle and Joseph are participating. Oak Hall is creating a tie for Mayor A C Wharton out of leftover fabric, and Dawn’s Couturiere is making a gown with a lampshade hat for opera diva Kallen Esperian. Pat Kerr Tigrett is showing one of her vintage wedding dresses.

On the more far-out side, there will be a cape made from an old screen door and a hat repurposed from a book by Hutchison senior and fashion whiz Evelyn Reed. Then there’s a Wonder Woman-esque outfit made from plastic bottles and a skirt with flattened soda and beer cans. Other notable looks: a dress made from trash bags and pages from The National Enquirer (“absolutely adorable,” per Lovett) and a sheath made of CDs (“absolutely incredible,” she says).

Proceeds from the trashion show will go toward Memphis City Beautiful grants for funding community gardens, planting trees, and other small neighborhood greening projects.

“There will be crazy things to see at the show,” Lovett says, “but it will have a purpose as well.”

Curb Couture Trashion Show, Sunday, June 5th, 6-8 p.m. on Main in front of the Cannon Center. Tickets are $50 and are available at curbcouture.eventbrite.com or by calling 522-1135. Rain date is Sunday, June 12th.

Categories
Daily Photo Special Sections

Trolley Crash

Trolleys collide at Main and Auction Wednesday afternoon.

Trolleys collide at Main and Auction on Wednesday afternoon.

Categories
News

Vito’s Cucina for Lunch

Susan Ellis and two Flyer co-workers checked out the new Italian drive-through restaurant, Vito’s Cucina.